United News of Bangladesh

A closely watched inflation gauge cooled last month in a sign that prices were steadily easing before most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs were implemented. At the same time, consumers accelerated their spending, particularly on cars, likely in an effort to get ahead of the duties. Wednesday’s report from the Commerce Department showed that consumer prices rose just 2.3% in March from a year earlier, down from 2.5% in February. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices rose 2.6% compared with a year ago, below February’s 2.8%. Economists track core prices because they typically provide a better read on where inflation is headed. The slowdown in inflation could be a temporary respite until the widespread duties imposed by Trump begin to push up prices in many categories. Economists forecast that inflation could reverse its recent decline and reach 3% or higher by the end of this year. Wednesday’s report also showed that consumer spending increased 0.7% from February to March, a healthy gain. Much of the increase appeared to be driven by efforts to get ahead of duties, such as Trump's 25% duty on imported cars, which took effect April 3. Spending on autos surged 8.1% in March, the government said. But spending on restaurants and hotels also jumped after falling in February, a sign Americans are still willing to splurge a little on travel and dining out. Car sales spiked last month as consumers and businesses accelerated acquisitions to get ahead of tariffs. That means auto sales may fade in the coming months because those assets have already been secured. Earlier Wednesday, the government reported that consumer spending slowed in the first three months of the year, compared with last year’s final quarter, as bad weather depressed shopping and Americans took a breather after healthy spending over the winter holidays. The nation’s economy actually shrank 0.3% in the January-March quarter as imports surged as companies sought to get ahead of Trump’s tariffs. Pakistan warns of imminent Indian Military Strike amid rising tensions Trump benefited in last year’s election from broad dissatisfaction among voters about the steep rise in prices that began in 2021 and that, on average, pushed prices up about 25% by the middle of last year. Grocery costs shot up nearly 30%. As a candidate, Trump said he would immediately lower prices if elected. Yet the president has slapped 25% duties on steel and aluminum, as well as cars, and a 10% tariff on nearly all other imports. And China, the United States’ third-largest trading partner, now faces a 145% duty on its exports. The inflation-fighters at the Federal Reserve target a 2% inflation rate and pay close attention to Wednesday’s inflation gauge, known as the personal consumption expenditures price index. The better-known consumer price index was released earlier this month and also showed a steady decline. Trump has pushed the Fed to cut its key short-term interest rate because inflation has cooled. But Fed Chair Jerome Powell has underscored that the central bank is likely to remain on the sidelines as officials gauge how tariffs will impact the economy. The Fed isn’t expected to lower its rate at its policy meeting next week.

The Trump administration has frozen, stalled or otherwise disrupted some $430 billion in federal funds — from disease research to Head Start for children to disaster aid — in what top Democrats say is an “unprecedented and dangerous" assault on programs used by countless Americans. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington and Rep. Rosa DeLauro of Connecticut on Tuesday released an online tracker that is compiling all the ways President Donald Trump and his adviser Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency are interrupting the flow of federal funds, often going up against the law. “Instead of investing in the American people, President Trump is ignoring our laws and ripping resources away,” said Murray and DeLauro, who are the top Democrats on the Appropriations committees in Congress. “No American president has ever so flagrantly ignored our nation’s spending laws or so brazenly denied the American people investments they are owed," they said. The tally is far from complete or exhaustive, the lawmakers said, but a snapshot in time. It comes in a rapidly changing political and legal environment as the Trump administration faces dozens of lawsuits from state and local governments, advocacy organizations, employees and others fighting to keep programs intact. Musk damaged Tesla’s brand in just a few months. Fixing it will likely take longer At 100 days into Trump's return to the presidency, the project showcases the extent to which the White House is blocking money that Congress has already approved, touching off a constitutional battle between the executive and legislative branches that has real world ramifications for the communities the lawmakers serve. The White House and its Republican allies in Congress have said they are working to root out waste, fraud and abuse in government. The Trump administration is in court fighting to keep many of the administration's cuts even as Musk, whose own popularity has dropped, says he will be cycling off DOGE’s day-to-day work. And Trump's director of the Office of Management and Budget intends to soon send Congress a $9 billion rescissions package, to claw back funds through cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development and others. Murray and DeLauro said they want to “shine a light on President Trump’s vast, illegal funding freeze and how it is hurting people in every zip code in America.” They said it's time for Trump and Musk “to end this unprecedented and dangerous campaign." While Republicans have also stirred with concerns about Trump's spending cuts, many are reluctant to do so publicly as they try to avoid Trump’s reactions. Instead, they tend to work behind the scenes to restore federal dollars to their home states or other constituencies that have been put at risk by Trump’s actions. The powerful Appropriations committees in the House and the Senate, where Republicans have majority control of both chambers, draft the annual funding bills that are ultimately approved by Congress and sent to the president’s desk for his signature to become law.

U.S. President Donald Trump's recent call for toll-free access for American ships through Egypt’s Suez Canal has sparked widespread criticism across Egypt, with legal scholars, political figures, and citizens condemning the demand as both legally unfounded and a threat to international norms. In a Saturday post on Truth Social — the platform he predominantly owns — Trump insisted that U.S. military and commercial vessels should pass through the Suez and Panama canals without paying fees. He asserted that neither canal "would exist" without American involvement and said he had instructed Secretary of State Marco Rubio to "take care of, and memorialize, this situation." "Trump's proposals about international waterways constitute a serious threat to international peace, security, and public order," said Ayman Salama, a professor of international law at Cairo University, in remarks to Xinhua on Monday. Salama referred to the 1888 Constantinople Convention, which established key legal principles for the operation of the Suez Canal, emphasizing equal access for all nations. He argued Trump’s remarks disregard the sovereignty of coastal nations and the legal principle of non-interference in domestic affairs — posing potential risks to global trade and economic stability. No court decision on Suez Canal s claim over massive vessel Calling the statements "legally baseless," Salama urged the international community to uphold maritime law and resist attempts to undermine the established legal framework for navigation. Samaa Soliman, deputy chairman of the Egyptian Senate's Foreign, Arab, and African Affairs Committee, stressed Monday that "only Egypt is responsible for securing and protecting the Suez Canal," adding that the transit fees are a vital national revenue stream that supports the economy and public services. She labeled Trump’s comments as "unjustified interference in the affairs of a sovereign state, and is inconsistent with the principle of mutual respect between states." Soliman also blamed U.S. policies for contributing to regional instability, citing Washington's stance on the Palestinian issue and its inaction against Houthi attacks in the Red Sea. According to the Suez Canal Authority (SCA), Egypt’s revenue from the canal dropped by over 60 percent year-on-year in 2024 due to tensions in the Red Sea, resulting in a loss of nearly $7 billion. Sayed Abdel Aal, head of Egypt’s socialist Tagammu Party, called Trump’s statement "provocative rhetoric" and said it reflects "a hateful colonial mentality." He noted that canal fees are applied fairly and in line with international standards, and the U.S. has no right to demand exceptions. "Trump's call can only be viewed as economic colonialism in a new garment," he added. The Egyptian Parties Alliance, representing around 42 political parties, also issued a statement on Sunday rejecting Trump's comments and accusing him of "ignoring historical facts." On Egyptian social media, users strongly pushed back against Trump’s assertion that the U.S. deserves credit for the canal’s existence. One widely circulated post stated, "Our grandfathers built the Suez Canal with their blood when America was engulfed in civil war. We will continue the course of our ancestors, and Trump will not impose his conditions on us." With ship now freed, a probe into Suez Canal blockage begins Opened in 1869, the Suez Canal has long been central to global maritime trade, linking the Mediterranean Sea with the Red Sea. Though shaped by colonial influence, it has become a powerful emblem of Egyptian sovereignty, particularly after its nationalization in 1956 by President Gamal Abdel Nasser — a landmark moment in the country's modern history.  

Dhaka, Aprin, 28 (AP/UNB)--More than 100 immigrants suspected of being in the United States illegally were taken into custody early Sunday following a federal raid at an illegal after-hours nightclub in Colorado Springs, Colorado, authorities said. Video posted online by the Drug Enforcement Administration showed agents announcing their presence outside the building and ordering patrons to leave with their hands up. Other videos showed dozens of people fleeing the building through its entrance after federal agents smashed a window. Later, dozens of suspects were shown in handcuffs standing on a sidewalk waiting to be transported. Russia launches nearly 150 drones against Ukraine During his second stint as U.S. president, Donald Trump ’s unprecedented campaign of immigration enforcement has pushed the limits of executive power, and he has clashed with federal judges trying to restrain him. The crackdown has included detaining more than 1,000 international college students, some of whom have seen their legal status restored, at least temporarily. The policies have slowed immigration at the southern border to a relative trickle. On Sunday in Colorado, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement took the club-going immigrants into custody, said Jonathan Pullen, special agent in charge of the DEA’s Rocky Mountain Division. “Colorado Springs is waking up to a safer community today,” he said. The city, Colorado’s second largest, lies about 70 miles (113 kilometers) south of Denver. More than 300 law enforcement officers and officials from multiple agencies responded to the nightclub, which had been under investigation for several months for alleged activities including drug trafficking, prostitution and “crimes of violence,” Pullen said at a news conference. Cocaine was among the drugs found, he said.   “When the cops showed up at the door, most of the drugs hit the floor,” Pullen said.   END/UNB/AP/MA

The U.S. government announced Friday that it is reversing recent terminations of legal status for international students, following widespread legal pushback. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) had removed many students from its federal database, stripping them of their legal right to stay in the country. However, multiple federal judges across the country have since issued temporary orders restoring the students’ status as part of lawsuits contesting the terminations. Foreign students face visa revocation Over 1,200 international students were affected, losing their visas or legal status—putting them at risk of deportation. Many reported being unaware of any serious violations, with some citing only minor issues or confusion about the reasons for the crackdown. As a result, some students left the U.S., while others have been forced to stop attending classes or go into hiding. Government says it will restore student status Word of the policy pivot came Friday from lawyers representing the government in several of the lawsuits. Iran to ink $4b oilfields deal with Russia A lawyer for the plaintiff in one of the lawsuits, Brian Green, provided The Associated Press with a copy of a statement a government lawyer emailed to him on the restoration of legal status for people whose records were recently terminated. It says: “ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be re-activated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination.” SEVIS is the Student and Exchange Visitor Information Systems database that tracks international students’ compliance with their visa status. NCIC is the National Crime Information Center, a database of criminal justice information maintained by the FBI. Tricia McLaughlin, an assistant Homeland Security secretary, said ICE had not reversed course on any visa revocations but did “restore SEVIS access for people who had not had their visa revoked.” Several colleges said Friday they noticed legal status already had been restored for some of their students, but uncertainty remained. “It is still unclear whether ICE will restore status to everyone it has targeted and whether the State Department will help students whose visas were wrongly revoked,” said Greg Chen of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. Legal fights may not be over Green, who is involved in lawsuits on behalf of several dozen students, said his cases only sought restoration of the student status and that he would be withdrawing them as a result of the statement Friday from ICE. But lawyers in the Oakland case are seeking a nationwide order from the court prohibiting the government from arresting or incarcerating students, transferring them to places outside their district or preventing them from continuing work or studies. Pam Johann, a government lawyer, said it was premature to consider anything like that given that ICE was in the process of reactivating records and developing a policy. “We should take a pause while ICE is implementing this change that plaintiffs are seeking right now, on its own,” she said. But U.S. District Judge Jeffrey S. White asked her to humor the court. “It seems like with this administration there’s a new world order every single day,” he said. “It’s like whack-a-mole.” He ordered the government to clarify the new policy.    

A group of 12 U.S. states has filed a lawsuit challenging President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policy, arguing that the administration overstepped its legal authority and bypassed Congress. Led by Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, the lawsuit criticizes the tariffs as both harmful to the economy and unconstitutional. "President Trump's insane tariff scheme is not only economically reckless — it is illegal," Mayes said in a statement. The states involved include Democratic-led Arizona, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, and others. California, though not part of this coalition, launched its own legal challenge just a week earlier. Since returning to office, Trump has disrupted global trade markets by announcing sweeping new tariffs as part of his so-called "Liberation Day" policy shift. The U.S. has slapped an additional 145% import tax on Chinese goods, prompting China to retaliate with a 125% tariff on American exports. Trump insists he's negotiating a "fair deal" with Beijing, but tensions remain high. Trump's Social Media ‘Buy’ tip pays off as markets rally following tariff delay In addition to the China-focused tariffs, the White House has implemented a 10% levy on imports from other trading partners, with threats of even more aggressive measures looming. At the heart of the legal challenge is the 1977 law Trump invoked to justify the tariffs, which the states argue does not grant the president the authority to impose sweeping trade restrictions unilaterally. The suit asserts that Trump's actions sidestep Congress and destabilize the economy. "The President cannot declare an emergency on a whim and levy massive tariffs at will," the lawsuit contends. "This undermines the constitutional balance of power and injects uncertainty into the global market." Global shares jump following historic gains on Wall St after Trump paused most of his tariffs Trump maintains that his protectionist approach is aimed at revitalizing U.S. manufacturing, but critics argue the costs fall on American consumers and businesses. "Tariffs are taxes, plain and simple — and Arizona families will be the ones footing the bill," Mayes said. Meanwhile, political fallout continues. According to The New York Times, Trump’s approval rating has dropped to 44%, just three months into his second term. Democratic leaders have pounced on the numbers, blaming the administration’s economic policies for rising costs and market instability. California Governor Gavin Newsom last week blasted the tariff strategy, calling it “the worst own-goal in the history of this country.”    

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent levelled harsh criticism at the operations of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund on Wednesday even as he tried to reassure nervous investors that the United States would maintain its global leadership role. “America first does not mean America alone,” he said in a speech to the Institute of International Finance. "To the contrary, it is a call for deeper collaboration and mutual respect among trade partners.” Although Bessent said the IMF and the World Bank are “falling short,” he stopped short of calling for the US to withdraw from the institutions as some conservatives have advocated. It was the latest example of how Bessent, a former hedge fund manager who keeps a close eye on the financial markets, has tried to calm the economic turmoil as President Donald Trump tries to rewire international trade through aggressive tariffs. After Bessent's remarks, reporters asked him about a Wall Street Journal article that said the huge US tariffs that the Republican president has levied on China could be cut in half, citing unidentified people familiar with the matter. Bessent said: “I’d be surprised if that discussion is happening." However, he said he expects “there’d have to be a de-escalation” from Washington and Beijing’s trade confrontation. Trump had said on Tuesday that the 145% tariffs on China could “come down substantially." And then on Wednesday, he told reporters that “everybody wants to be a part of what we're doing" and “everyone's going to be happy.” Bessent's speech in Washington represented a broadside against the IMF and the World Bank, which provide loans and other financial support around the world. He said the Trump administration “will leverage US leadership and influence at these institutions and push them to accomplish their important mandates.” EVs in the spotlight as China claims a leading global role at Shanghai's auto show Some of Bessent's criticisms echoed the Trump administration's efforts to root out progressive ideology from federal institutions. Bessent said the IMF “has suffered from mission creep” and “devotes disproportionate time and resources to work on climate change, gender and social issues.” He said there were similar problems at the World Bank, which he said “should no longer expect blank checks for vapid, buzzword-centric marketing accompanied by half-hearted commitments to reform.” One of the problems, Bessent said, is that China is still treated like a developing country, which gives it more favorable treatment from global institutions. With China as the second-largest economy in the world, he said, “it's an adult economy.” Despite growing friction between Beijing and Washington, Bessent said “there is an opportunity for a big deal here.” Bessent wants the US to boost manufacturing while China increases consumption, making its economy less reliant on flooding the globe with cheap exports. “If they want to rebalance, let’s do it together,” he said. “This is an incredible opportunity.” Beijing said Wednesday that “exerting pressure is not the right way to deal with China and simply will not work.”

Elon Musk has announced plans to "significantly" reduce his involvement in the US government's advisory operations following a major dip in Tesla’s profits and sales at the beginning of the year. Since last year, Musk has headed the Department for Government Efficiency (Doge), a new advisory body focused on reducing federal spending and workforce, placing the billionaire at the forefront of major political decision-making, reports BBC. However, amid growing concerns over his attention to Tesla, Musk said his "time allocation to Doge" would "drop significantly" starting next month. He indicated he would limit his work on the initiative to just one or two days per week. His political activities have triggered international backlash, including protests and calls to boycott Tesla vehicles. Typically, temporary federal advisors like Musk are restricted to 130 working days annually, a limit he is nearing if calculated from President Donald Trump's inauguration date. Despite that, it remains uncertain when Musk, who donated over $250 million to Trump’s re-election bid, will officially step down. Trump recently stated he would retain Musk “as long as I could keep him”. Musk reiterated his commitment to Tesla, saying he would now "be allocating far more of my time to Tesla." Still, he stopped short of a full exit from government duties, calling the Doge project “critical” and saying he would remain involved “as long as the president would like me to do so and as long as it's useful”. Tesla reported a 20% year-on-year decline in vehicle sales for the first quarter, with profits dropping over 70%. The company refrained from providing a growth outlook, warning that “changing political sentiment” might significantly affect demand. Musk attributed the backlash to those seeking to “attack me and the Doge team.” Tesla shares have fallen around 37% this year, though they saw a post-earnings recovery of over 5% in after-hours trading on Tuesday. The firm is also grappling with the effects of Trump’s tariffs on China. Although Tesla’s US-market vehicles are assembled domestically, many components are sourced from China. The company warned that “rapidly evolving trade policy” could disrupt its supply chain and increase costs. “This dynamic, along with changing political sentiment, could have a meaningful impact on demand for our products in the near-term,” the company stated in its quarterly report. Musk has had disagreements over trade policy with Trump officials, including trade adviser Peter Navarro. On Tuesday, Musk claimed Tesla is among the least affected carmakers due to localized supply chains across North America, Europe, and China, but acknowledged tariffs still pose challenges. “I’ll continue to advocate for lower tariffs rather than higher tariffs but that’s all I can do,” he said. Earlier in the month, Musk called Navarro a “moron” following the latter’s remarks dismissing Tesla as merely a “car assembler, in many cases.” Georg Ell, a former Tesla executive and current CEO of translation software firm Phrase, told BBC’s Today programme, “If the multi-billionaire focuses on the companies where he is extraordinary, I think people will focus once again on the quality of the product and experiences.” He added, “I think Elon is not someone who surrounds himself with a great diversity of opinion to challenge his thinking, he’s a pretty single-minded individual.” Tesla expressed optimism about artificial intelligence driving future growth, though investors remain skeptical. Dan Coatsworth, an investment analyst at AJ Bell, said expectations were at “rock-bottom,” citing a 13% fall in car sales—Tesla’s lowest quarterly figure in three years. He also pointed to intensifying competition and potential global supply chain disruptions stemming from Trump’s trade actions. “Tesla’s problems are mounting,” Coatsworth said.

The H-1B visa has long been a highly coveted employment visa for foreign citizens with specialized skills to live and work in the U.S., and recent requests from the Trump administration have put greater attention on the program. The requests for more information from people applying for or renewing H-1B visas come amid heightened tensions over immigration as President Donald Trump seeks to make good on his vow of mass deportations of people in the country illegally. Much of Trump's agenda has been focused on arresting people in the country illegally or reversing Biden-era temporary deportation protections. There has been less attention on employment-based visas or other parts of the legal immigration system — though more than 1,000 international students have had their visas or legal status revoked. The requests for information come as the H-1B visa program is already a source of division within Trump’s Republican Party. Here’s a look at what the H-1B visa program is, what critics and supporters say about it, and how the administration's recent questions have raised concerns. What is an H-1B visa? The H-1B was created as part of the 1990 Immigration Act. It is a type of nonimmigrant visa, meaning it allows for a temporary stay in the U.S. and is not intended for people who want to immigrate permanently. Some eventually do, but only after transitioning to different immigration statuses. The Biden administration is poised to allow Israeli citizens to travel to the US without a US visa An H-1B allows employers to hire foreign workers who have specialized skills and a bachelor's degree or equivalent. Who uses H-1B visas? The visa is most commonly associated with the tech industry. About 60% or more of the H-1B visas approved every year since 2012 have been for computer-related jobs, according to the Pew Research Center. But health care facilities, financial institutions, universities and just about any other employer looking to address workforce shortages can and do apply for H-1B visas. The number of new visas issued annually has been capped at 65,000, plus an additional 20,000 for people with a master's degree or higher. Some employers, such as universities and nonprofits, are exempt from the limits. People from India are by far the biggest users of these visas, according to Pew. The organization said that since 2010, the majority of approvals every year have gone to people born in India. What makes the H-1B program controversial? The idea behind the H-1B visa is that it allows employers to hire from abroad for jobs that they haven't been able to fill in the U.S. Proponents say the visa is a critical tool for hard-to-fill positions. But critics on both sides of the aisle have said that it undercuts U.S. citizens who could take those jobs. Some on the right have called for the program to be eliminated. And earlier this year, Bernie Sanders, an independent senator from Vermont, wrote a scathing open letter saying the program's real purpose was to “replace American workers with lower-paid workers from abroad who often live as indentured servants.” The debate over the future of H-1B visas is especially pronounced within the GOP. On one side are wealthy members of the tech world who support the visas to help bring in more highly skilled workers. On the other side are people of Trump’s Make America Great Again base who championed his immigration policies and say these visas allow employers to pay foreigners lower wages than if they hired Americans. The issue played out in a very public spat late last year after Trump tapped Sriram Krishnan, who favors bringing in more skilled immigrants into the U.S., as an adviser on artificial intelligence policy. What's going on with reports of unusual letters over H-1B visas? In recent days, some immigration lawyers have reported receiving unusual requests about clients applying for or renewing H-1B visas or other types of employment-related visas. Kevin Miner, a partner at global immigration law firm Fragomen, said dozens of members from the American Immigration Lawyers Association, or AILA, received the requests in letters over roughly the last two weeks. He cited two versions: One says the immigration service has identified “adverse information” related to the visa applicant, and they must schedule an appointment to collect biometrics for the case to proceed. The second, he said, just says that biometrics are needed without any mention of “adverse information.” Miner said these requests have generally been asked of people applying for or renewing an H-1B visa or an I-140, which is an employee-sponsored green card. US visa restrictions: State Dept spokesperson once again refrains from mentioning media Miner pointed to two things that make these requests unusual: Generally, biometrics aren’t required for these types of visas and, usually, when the government wants more information, its requests are specific. “It’s usually a back-and-forth process,” said Miner, who chairs a policy and benefits committee for the nonpartisan AILA. “This is different.” Miner also said that if the government is going to add additional steps to the process, officials would usually go through the notice-and-comment period, which alerts lawyers and applicants of approaching changes. “That’s not something that they’ve done here,” Miner said. A spokesman for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, which falls under the Department of Homeland Security, said in an emailed statement that they are increasing screening and vetting of all foreign citizens filing for immigration benefits as part of the Trump administration's “commitment to restoring integrity to our immigration system" and said those efforts had “lapsed” under the previous administration. “Collecting beneficiary information and biometric data is a necessary part of USCIS’s efforts to promote national security and public safety and to mitigate fraud by conducting screening and vetting in all immigration programs and the agency is proud to be returning to this important work,” agency spokesman Matthew Tragesser said. What is happening with immigration policy? The Trump administration has promised mass deportations of people living in the U.S. illegally, tried to strip hundreds of thousands of people of their deportation protections and is revoking visas of international students. More than 1,000 international students have had their visas or legal status revoked since early April, according to an Associated Press review of university statements, correspondence with school officials and court records. The revocations often come with little notice to either students or their schools, and are being initiated by the government, a departure from past precedent — university officials have largely made administrative updates to the database when a student graduated or fell out of good academic standing. Miner said people are concerned that similar actions might follow for those on employment-related visas. “There’s just so much unknown,” he said.

WASHINGTON, Apr 22 (UNB/AP) — The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reported Tuesday that the economic outlook for both the United States and the broader global economy has deteriorated significantly due to President Donald Trump’s tariffs and the uncertainty they have triggered. In its latest World Economic Outlook, the IMF revised its projection for global growth this year to 2.8%, down from the 3.3% it forecast in January. The fund also expects global growth to reach just 3% in 2026, falling short of its earlier estimate of 3.3%. The U.S. economy is now forecast to grow only 1.8% in 2025, a sharp decline from the previous projection of 2.7%, and one percentage point lower than the estimated growth for 2024. While the IMF does not predict a recession in the United States, it has increased the likelihood of one from 25% to 37%. These projections are broadly consistent with those of many private analysts, though some foresee even greater risks. JPMorgan economists, for instance, now assess the chance of a U.S. recession at 60%. The Federal Reserve also expects a slowdown, forecasting 1.7% growth this year. “We are entering a new era,” said Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, the IMF’s chief economist. “This global economic system that has operated for the last eighty years is being reset.” The IMF, a 191-member international financial institution, aims to foster global economic growth, maintain financial stability, and alleviate poverty. Gourinchas noted that due to the elevated uncertainty linked to the import tariffs, the IMF took the unusual measure of developing multiple scenarios for future economic outcomes. Its projections were finalized on April 4, just after the Trump administration unveiled sweeping tariffs covering nearly 60 countries and imposing nearly universal 10% duties. Although the tariffs were suspended on April 9 for 90 days, Gourinchas said this temporary pause did not substantially affect the IMF’s forecasts, given the continued imposition of steep tariffs between the U.S. and China. The IMF warned that the ongoing uncertainty over future U.S. trade policy is likely to put further pressure on both domestic and global economic performance. Businesses may delay investment or expansion decisions while awaiting clearer policy direction, potentially slowing growth further. The impact of U.S. tariffs is also expected to curb China’s economic expansion. The IMF now anticipates China’s economy will grow 4% in both 2025 and 2026—about half a percentage point lower than previously forecast. While the U.S. economy is likely to experience a “supply shock” akin to the one seen during the pandemic—when inflation surged in 2021 and 2022—Gourinchas said China will face weaker demand as American imports of Chinese goods decline. Inflation in the U.S. is projected to climb to around 3% by the end of the year, while China’s inflation rate is expected to remain relatively stable, according to the IMF. Europe is also set to experience slower growth, though the impact of tariffs is expected to be less severe there, partly because U.S. duties on EU goods are lower than those on Chinese imports. Additionally, increased government spending in Germany is expected to help cushion some of the economic blow. The IMF projects the eurozone’s 27 member states will grow by 0.8% in 2025 and 1.2% in 2026—both figures trimmed by just 0.2 percentage points from January’s estimates. Meanwhile, Japan’s economic outlook has also been revised downward. The IMF now expects the country to grow by 0.6% in both 2025 and 2026, representing reductions of 0.5 and 0.2 percentage points, respectively, from its earlier projections.