West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has firmly said that her government will not implement the Narendra Modi-led central government’s newly-enacted Waqf law in the state. Pointing at the violence-hit areas of Murshidabad district on Saturday, Banerjee appealed for calm and urged all communities to refrain from being provoked by political interests. “We have made our position clear on this matter — we do not support this law. This law will not be implemented in our state. So what is the riot about?” Banerjee wrote on social media platform X. She appealed to the public, saying, “My sincere appeal to all people of all religions: please remain calm, remain restrained. Do not engage in any unrighteous behaviour in the name of religion. Every human life is precious. Do not incite riots for the sake of politics. Those who are inciting riots are harming society.” The statement came a day after violent protests erupted in parts of Murshidabad following Friday prayers, reportedly triggered by rumours regarding the central government's Waqf legislation. India’s Parliament approves controversial Waqf Bill amid opposition protests According to Director General of Police Rajeev Kumar, misinformation led to large-scale unrest, resulting in clashes between protesters and police. At least 15 police officials were injured during the violence, which saw government buildings, police outposts, railway offices and shops vandalised and set on fire. Residents described the chaos as a “night of horror,” recounting how law enforcement was initially absent from the scene. “There were no police officials. They were just scared. Sitting inside their houses like us,” said a shopkeeper in Dhulian, whose business was torched during the violence. Banerjee reminded the public that the Waqf law in question was not brought forward by her party, the Trinamool Congress, but by the BJP-led central government. “The law was made by the central government. So the answer you want should be sought from the central government,” she said, adding that the state would take strict action against those responsible for the violence. The chief minister also accused certain political factions of misusing religion for political gain. “Some political parties are trying to misuse religion for political gain. Do not give in to their persuasion,” she warned. Source: With inputs from India Today 

Three suspected militants and an army officer have been killed in two separate gunbattles in Indian-controlled Kashmir, the Indian army said Saturday. Army soldiers laid a cordon in a forested area in southern Kishtwar district on Wednesday following a tip that a group of insurgents was operating there, an army statement said, AP reports. A search in the area by soldiers led to a firefight with militants, initially leaving one militant dead late Wednesday, the statement said. It added that despite inclement weather, troops maintained their cordon in the area, triggering more exchanges of gunfire that resulted in the killing of two more militants on Saturday. The army did not report any casualties on its side. However, in another incident, the Indian army said its soldiers in southern Akhnoor area intercepted a group of militants close to the heavily militarized Line of Control dividing the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir between India and Pakistan late Friday. Fighting ensued during which one army officer was killed, it said. The statement said militants were trying to infiltrate into the Indian side from the Pakistan-controlled area. China, ASEAN media and think tanks urged to embrace AI, address its challenges There was no independent confirmation of either of the incidents. Nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi’s rule since 1989. Many Muslim Kashmiris support the rebels’ goal of uniting the territory, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle. Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the conflict. The territory has simmered in anger since 2019 when New Delhi ended the region’s semiautonomy and drastically curbed dissent, civil liberties and media freedoms while intensifying counterinsurgency operations.

India is among seven possible bidders wanting to host the 2031 Asian Cup in men’s soccer, the Asian Football Confederation said Friday. China was not among them. The other federations registering interest to enter the contest are Australia, Indonesia, Kuwait, South Korea — which has never hosted the tournament launched in 1956 — United Arab Emirates and a joint project between Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The AFC said a decision on hosting the 24-team tournament is scheduled next year at its annual congress. Two fans die before Colo Colo vs Fortaleza match in Chile Australia hosted and won the Asian Cup in 2015. The UAE hosted in 2019, starting a run of three straight editions in the Gulf. Qatar hosted the 2023 edition and Saudi Arabia has the 2027 Asian Cup, where Qatar will be the two-time defending champion. Qatar stepped in for the 2023 Asian Cup that had been awarded to China four years earlier. China pulled out citing health restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indonesia co-hosted the 2007 Asian Cup and had the final in Jakarta. Kuwait hosted and won the 1980 tournament.

India’s parliament on Wednesday began discussing a controversial proposal by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu nationalist government to amend laws governing Muslim land endowments in the country. The bill would add non-Muslims to boards that manage waqf land endowments and give the government a larger role in validating their land holdings. The government says the changes will help to fight corruption and mismanagement while promoting diversity, but critics fear that it will further undermine the rights of the country's Muslim minority and could be used to confiscate historic mosques and other property from them. Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju introduced the Waqf Amendment Bill on Wednesday, which would reform a 1995 law that set rules for the foundations and set up state-level boards to administer them. Debate in the parliament’s Lower House is expected to be heated as the Congress-led opposition is firmly against the proposal. Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party does not have a majority but may be able to depends on allies to pass the bill. Both BJP and the Congress have asked their lawmakers to be present in the House. If passed, the bill will need to clear the Upper House before it is sent to President Droupadi Murmu for her assent to become a law. Many Muslim groups as well as the opposition parties say the proposal is discriminatory, politically motivated and an attempt by Modi’s ruling party to weaken the minority rights. US lifts bounties on senior Taliban officials, including Sirajuddin Haqqani The controversial bill was first introduced in parliament last year, but was later sent to a committee of lawmakers for discussion after opposition parties raised concerns. The committee’s report was tabled in both houses of parliament on Feb. 13 amid protests by opposition leaders who said that their inputs were ignored. The government claims that opposition parties are using rumors to discredit them and block transparency in managing the endowments. What's a waqf? Waqfs are a traditional type of Islamic charitable foundation in which a donor permanently sets aside property — often but not always real estate — for religious or charitable purposes. Waqfs in India control 872,000 properties that cover 405,000 hectares (1 million acres) of land, worth an estimated $14.22 billion. Some of these endowments date back centuries, and many are used for mosques, seminaries, graveyards and orphanages. Law would change who runs waqfs In India, waqf property is managed by semi-official boards, one for each of the country’s states and federally-run union territories. The law would require non-Muslims to be appointed to the boards. Currently, waqf boards are staffed by Muslims, like similar bodies that help administer other religious charities. One of the most controversial amendments is the change to ownership rules, which potentially could impact historical mosques, shrines and graveyards under the waqf. It could change the ownership rules of many of these properties which lack formal documentation as they were donated without legal records decades, and sometimes, even centuries ago. Questions about title Other changes could impact historic mosques, whose land is often held in centuries-old waqfs. Hindu radical groups have targeted mosques across the country and laid claim to several of them, arguing they are built on the ruins of important Hindu temples. Many such cases are pending in courts. The law would require waqf boards to seek approval from a district level officer to confirm waqfs' claims to property. Critics say that would undermine the board and could lead to Muslims being stripped of their land. It's not clear how often the boards would be asked to confirm such claims to land. Fears among Muslims While many Muslims agree that waqfs suffer from corruption, encroachments and poor management, they also fear that the new law could give India’s Hindu nationalist government far greater control over Muslim properties, particularly at a time when attacks against the minority communities have become more aggressive under Modi, with Muslims often targeted for everything from their food and clothing styles to inter-religious marriages. Last month, the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom said in its annual report that religious freedom conditions in India continued to deteriorate while Modi and his party “propagated hateful rhetoric and disinformation against Muslims and other religious minorities” during last year’s election campaign. Modi's government says India is run on democratic principles of equality and no discrimination exists in the country. Muslims, which make 14 percent of India’s 1.4 billion population, are the largest minority group in the Hindu-majority nation but they are also the poorest, a 2013 government survey found.

Tonight, the journey begins. Bangladesh are taking on India on Tuesday evening at the Nehru Stadium in Shillong in a high-stake AFC Asian Cup 2027 qualifying match. In this match, Hamza Choudhury set for a landmark debut for Bangladesh. The game, kicking off at 7 PM local time, is being billed as more than just a qualifier—it’s going to be a symbolic showdown between past dominance and fresh hope. Born in England to a Bangladeshi mother and Grenadian father, Hamza's decision to represent Bangladesh has already stirred nationwide excitement. From fans lighting flares at Sylhet airport to his warm reception at his ancestral village in Snanghat, the Premier League midfielder’s arrival has brought new life into a struggling football nation. Currently on loan at Sheffield United from Leicester City, Hamza is the most high-profile player ever to wear Bangladesh’s red and green. With 57 Premier League appearances and an FA Cup medal, his pedigree brings a level of experience rarely seen in South Asian football. Thousands welcome football star Hamza Choudhury home to his village in Sylhet Hamza’s debut adds fresh intrigue to Bangladesh’s clash against India—an opponent that has haunted them for over a decade, primarily through the brilliance of Sunil Chhetri. The Indian captain, who recently reversed his international retirement, has scored six goals in six appearances against Bangladesh, including match-winners and late heartbreakers. Chhetri’s influence remains formidable, but Hamza offers Bangladesh something they’ve never had before: a midfielder capable of dictating play at the highest level. “We have to help him. He is obviously the best player in South Asia,” Bangladesh captain Jamal Bhuyan said recently to the reporters. Jamal, an expat himself, has led the national team through years of underachievement. He believes Hamza’s inclusion could signal a shift in Bangladesh’s footballing identity, opening the door for other diaspora players to join. The buzz around Hamza’s arrival has already begun paying dividends. The Bangladesh Football Federation recently secured a five-year sponsorship deal with United Commercial Bank—its first long-term sponsor—partly credited to the increased visibility Hamza has brought to the national team. In training, Hamza has quickly gelled with teammates. “Hamza has adapted very quickly to the squad. It feels like he has been playing with us for a long time,” said midfielder Sohel Rana. Hamza Choudhury cleared by FIFA to play for Bangladesh Defender Topu Barman echoed the sentiment. “He is fit, and so are we. Our mental approach this time is different. We’re travelling with a winning mentality,” Topu said. India, however, will not make it easy. After a long winless streak, they found form last week, beating Maldives 3-0. Chhetri returned with a goal, and players like Liston Colaco and Ayush Dev Chhetri impressed in attack. Coach Manolo Marquez will be wary of Hamza’s impact but confident in his team’s depth and set-piece strength. For Bangladesh, the stakes are clear— break the Chhetri curse, make a statement in Asian football, and ride the wave of Hamza Choudhury’s arrival into a new era. For Hamza, it’s not just about playing for Bangladesh—it’s about inspiring a generation that dreams of seeing their nation rise on the global stage.

Even after the arrival of 18,800 metric tonnes (MT) of rice from India via Benapole land port in the last four months, market prices remain high, causing hardship for consumers, particularly those from low-income groups.  Despite government efforts to stabilise the situation, the price surge continues to strain household budgets. The substantial quantity of rice was imported between 17 November and 13 March under the 2024-25 fiscal year through eight authorised importers, enjoying a duty-free facility.  The most recent consignment of 350 MT of rice entered the country through the port on 13 March. In an effort to stabilise the rice market and ensure food security, the government has permitted major rice importers to bring in rice from abroad. On 6 March, a notice signed by Mohammad Ariful Islam, Deputy Secretary to the Ministry of Food, extended the deadline for opening letters of credit (LCs) for the import of non-Basmati boiled rice and Atap rice until 15 April. Multiple Deadline Extensions According to Benapole customs sources, the government authorised 92 institutions across the country to import 273,000 MT of boiled rice and 119,000 MT of Atap rice.  But many importers have been unable to bring in their allocated quotas due to various challenges. The government has extended the import deadline multiple times due to the slow progress in import activities. Initially set for 15 January, the deadline has since been extended several times, with the latest extension allowing imports to continue until 15 April to ensure adequate supplies in the market. Govt approves import of 50,000 MT of rice from India Rising Prices Despite Increased Supply Despite continuous rice imports, market prices have remained high, with a noticeable surge in recent weeks.  Middle-income and low-income consumers are bearing the brunt of the price hike, despite the government’s efforts to stabilise the market. Rice trader Din Mohammad said that prices have increased by Tk 4-5 per kilogram since the start of Ramadan.  For instance, the 28 varieties of rice, previously sold at Tk 64 per kg, are now priced between Tk 68-69 per kg. Miniket rice, previously Tk 72 per kg, has risen to Tk 76, while coarse rice has increased from Tk 52 to Tk 56 per kg. Basmati rice, which was Tk 84 per kg, is now selling for Tk 88-90. "Indian rice is available for Tk 58 per kg, but its demand in the market remains low," he added. Din Mohammad also expressed doubts over the possibility of a price reduction during Ramadan, saying that despite continuous imports from India, market prices remain unaffected. Rice prices soar in Kushtia amid halt in milling Efforts for Efficient Distribution Shamim Hossain, Director of Traffic at the port, assured that trucks carrying imported rice from India receive swift clearance to facilitate rapid distribution to local markets. Mohammad Kamruzzaman, Commissioner of Benapole Customs House, highlighted the strategic importance of Benapole Land Port in expanding import-export trade. "Due to its proximity to Kolkata, the port enables businesses to save both time and costs in trade operations. With an efficient transportation network, goods cleared at the port can quickly reach various district markets across the country," he said. Despite these efforts, the struggle to stabilise the rice market continues, with consumers hoping for relief in the coming weeks.  

A storied cricket rivalry will add a new chapter when India and Australia square off in the first semifinal of the Champions Trophy on Tuesday. And it comes with controversy. While Pakistan is hosting the tournament, India has not gone near Pakistan, refusing to go there. Instead, India has played all of its games in Dubai amid security concerns. This has caused debate about India's advantage from playing in one venue that has marred the buildup to the knockout rounds. The Indian government denied permission for the cricket team to travel to its neighbour. The latest refusal came on the heels of viable security threats – tensions on the border, particularly in the northern region of Jammu and Kashmir. India stumble to 249 as Matt Henry’s five-for puts New Zealand on top While Pakistan went to India for the 2023 Cricket World Cup, the last time either team toured the other was 12 years ago. Because the tournament couldn't be played without India's financial muscle, all of its games are in Dubai, including the semifinal and the final on Sunday, if it qualifies. If not, the final will be in Lahore. It has caused scheduling and travel headaches for the Champions Trophy. Bizarrely, Pakistan had to give up hosting rights and go to Dubai to face India, and lost. South Africa and Australia flew to Dubai last Saturday because it wasn’t clear which team would take on India in the semifinals. Only after India beat New Zealand on Sunday in the last group game did South Africa return to Pakistan late Sunday with New Zealand to prepare for their semifinal on Wednesday in Lahore. The preferential treatment has put India in an advantageous position to many eyes. "If you can stay in one hotel, practice in the same facilities, play in the same stadium, on the same pitches every time, it’s definitely an advantage,” South Africa's Rassie van der Dussen said on Thursday. But India captain Rohit Sharma shrugged off talk of any advantage. “We are very much aware of the conditions here, but we don’t know which pitch is going to be played," Sharma said. "This is not our home, this is Dubai. We don’t play so many matches here. This is new for us, too.” Anushka to attend Virat Kohli’s 300th ODI in Champions Trophy Dubai was chosen because its the largest of the UAE’s three cricket grounds; it seats up to 30,000 fans compared to Abu Dhabi (20,000) and Sharjah (16,000). India played its three group games at Dubai International Cricket Stadium — on different pitches — and won them all. “They are in Dubai for a reason," Pakistan coach Aqib Javed said. "If you play on the same pitch or ground, you will have an advantage. But we didn’t lose because they stayed in the same hotel or played on the same pitch. Neither did they play 10 matches there.” Depleted Australia has defied the odds The India-Australia semifinal is a rematch of the 2023 World Cup final in Ahmedabad where Australia upset India and sent the country into mourning. This time, Australia isn't at full strength. It is missing its front-line pace attack and opening batter Matt Short has been sidelined by a quad injury, and replaced by left-arm spinner Cooper Connolly. Connolly's selection pays respect to Dubai's spin-friendly pitches. But Australia doesn't normally bank heavy on spin, and has defied the odds to reach the semifinals under Steve Smith. India, however, unleashed a fourth extra spinner on New Zealand, and they shared nine wickets as they defended 249 with ease. Whether India stays with four spinners or goes back to three is its main question. “Even if we want to play four spinners, how can we squeeze (them in)," Sharma said. “If we don’t, then we don’t.”

Pakistan captain Mohammad Rizwan has won the coin toss and opted to bat first against India in their Group A game at the 2025 Champions Trophy on Sunday. The arch rivals meet at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium despite Pakistan hosting the tournament, as India is playing its league games – and potential knockout matches – in the United Arab Emirates. Indian cricket authorities have offered no formal statement about refusing to play in Pakistan, but some officials have suggested that the decision was based on security concerns. Passion, politics and patriotism meld as Pakistan and India clash in cricket's fiercest rivalry Pakistan got off to a poor start in home conditions earlier on – it lost the opening game of the tournament against New Zealand by 60 runs. It faces a must-win situation against India today to stay alive in the tournament. India won its opener against Bangladesh by six wickets in Dubai and will look to carry forward its winning momentum. Another win will confirm its spot in the semi-finals. The last time these two sides met in the Champions Trophy was back in 2017, where Pakistan beat India in the final by 180 runs in London. Pakistan has made one change – Fakhar Zaman is ruled out owing to an injury sustained in the opening game. Imam ul Haq is his replacement and comes into the playing eleven. India has fielded an unchanged eleven. The pitch at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium is expected to be slow in nature – a dual-paced surface that could aid both pacers and spinners as the game progresses. Evening dew could help the chasing side. Inglis leads Australia to record chase against England in Champions Trophy thriller Line-ups: India: Rohit Sharma (captain), Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, Axar Patel, Lokesh Rahul, Hardik Pandya, Ravindra Jadeja, Harshit Rana, Mohammed Shami, Kuldeep Yadav Pakistan: Imam-ul-Haq, Babar Azam, Saud Shakeel, Mohammad Rizwan (captain), Salman Agha, Tayyab Tahir, Khushdil Shah, Shaheen Afridi, Naseem Shah, Haris Rauf, Abrar Ahmed

US President Donald Trump has criticised the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for allegedly allocating funds to interfere in India's electoral process, questioning why American taxpayers' money was being sent to the country. Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington on Sunday, President Trump alleged that India already benefits from high tariffs on American goods and does not require financial assistance for its elections. "Eighteen million dollars for helping India with its elections. Why the hell? Why don’t we just go to old paper ballots and let them help us with our elections, right? Voter ID. Wouldn’t that be nice? We’re giving money to India for elections. They don’t need money," Trump remarked. The figure quoted by Trump could not be independently verified. A prior report from the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) suggested that $21 million had been allocated for "voter turnout" in India. "They take advantage of us pretty good. One of the highest tariffed nations in the world. We try and sell something, they have a 200 per cent tariff. And then we’re giving them a lot of money to help them with their election," he continued. India Responds to Trump's Allegations India's External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar addressed the concerns raised by Trump, stating that the government was looking into the matter. Trump says $29 million in USAID money went to firm 'with just 2 people' "Some information has been put out there by the Trump administration people, and obviously, that is concerning. I think, as a government, we’re looking into it. My sense is that the facts will come out. USAID was allowed here in good faith, to do good faith activities; now, suggestions are being laid out from America that there are activities which are in bad faith. It’s worrisome, and if there’s something to it, then the country should know who the people are involved in it," Jaishankar said. Meanwhile, the opposition Congress party has demanded a white paper on all foreign aid received by India from developmental agencies. Congress has also called for legal action against those propagating what it terms "baseless allegations" of foreign interference in Indian democracy. Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera countered Trump’s claim, stating, "More Indian news media outlets have fact-checked the claim by BJP and Modi government’s minister as untrue. Funds went to Bangladesh, not India; although India received USAID funds, it was not for increasing voter turnout." Allegations of Funding in Bangladesh In addition to his claims about India, Trump also alleged that an unnamed firm in Bangladesh had received $29 million in USAID funding. "Got USD 29 million. They got a cheque. Can you imagine? You have a little firm, you get 10,000 here, 10,000 there, and then we get 29 million from the United States government. There are two people working in that firm... I think they’re very happy, they’re very rich. They’ll be on the cover of a very good business magazine pretty soon for being great scammers," Trump alleged. Congress has urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to personally address these claims and refute the allegations. The party has also criticised the ruling BJP, accusing it of exploiting Trump’s comments to advance conspiracy theories. Judge blocks Trump’s plan to place 2,200 USAID employees on paid leave "There is no record of a Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS) programme matching the US government’s description in India. CEPPS did have a $21 million USAID contract, but it was for Bangladesh, not India," Khera stated. BJP Dismisses Congress’s Defence BJP leader Ajay Alok dismissed Congress’s statements as "baseless," asserting that the Modi government has significantly curtailed foreign aid flows. "We have already shown that the government got $2,119 million between 2004-14 and just $1.5 million between 2014-25. We are shutting down these things. The Indian government is now acting, the US government has issued a list of who has got the money from where... this is part of a deep state. The Bharat Jodo Yatra was also being funded from this money," Alok claimed. With both the Indian and Bangladeshi governments yet to issue a formal statement on the matter, the controversy is likely to continue, further complicating diplomatic relations between India and the United States ahead of key elections in both nations. Source: Agencies

It is a sports rivalry like no other in the world. When India and Pakistan face off in Dubai on Sunday, the cricket contest will be amped up by so much more — the 78 years of bitterness between the two arch rival nations, the heightened political hostilities, and the patriotic zeal of hundreds of millions of people. Cricket-mad nations India and Pakistan are competing in the game’s 50-over format for the coveted eight-nation Champions Trophy tournament that began on Wednesday in Pakistan. While six national teams have travelled to Pakistan for the tournament, India has refused to go there by leveraging its strong influence on International Cricket Council, the game's global governing body. Indian cricket authorities have offered no formal statement about refusing to play in Pakistan, but some officials have suggested that the decision was based on security concerns. India will play all its matches — including the one against Pakistan — at a neutral venue in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates. The game's political undertones In both India and Pakistan, cricket has become a symbol of national identity and every clash grabs the attention of more than a billion fans. And Sunday's match comes at a time when relations between the two neighbors have hit a new low. That animosity largely stems from the two countries' dispute over Kashmir, a restive Himalayan region over which they have fought two wars. Nuclear-armed rivals each administer part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety. Compounding the territorial dispute are heightened tensions stemming from the deadly 2008 Mumbai attacks that India blamed on Pakistani militants, a charge Islamabad denies. And sporting relations inevitably ebb and flow with the politics. Bilateral cricket ties have remained suspended since 2008, and the two national teams have only played each other in global events where they are always paired together in a group to ensure there is a contest between them. Even though the Indian team has not travelled to Pakistan since 2008, Pakistan played in India in 2023 during the World Cup, including before a hostile crowd at a cricket stadium named after Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Inglis leads Australia to record chase against England in Champions Trophy thriller So-called “cricket diplomacy” has occasionally thawed out relations but that hasn't been the case under Modi. His Hindu nationalist government has taken a tough stance on resuming friendlier cricket ties with Pakistan with many senior ministers saying Indian team won’t play in the country. Dozens of people in India and disputed Kashmir have also faced police complaints and sometimes even jail for cheering for the Pakistani team. “Cricket is the strongest currency in the eyes of this government which they have used to instigate resentment and anger against Pakistan,” said Sharda Ugra, an Indian sports writer. Ugra said while the fans of the two countries are eager to watch the two nations play more often, the contest “has been held hostage to ugly politics.” The eyes of hundreds of millions are on the game In sheer numbers, viewership for the India-Pakistan match dwarfs the Super Bowl in what Ugra calls the “greatest sports rivalry in the world” bar none. When the two sides played against each other in 2023 in India, the estimated viewership — on cable television and streaming services — was around 400 million. In comparison, this year’s Super Bowl averaged a 127.7 million across all platforms in the U.S. Organizers expect similar numbers for Sunday’s contest that will be played at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium. And it's a guaranteed windfall as tickets for the game sold out within minutes while billion-dollar broadcast deals have been hammered out. Media in both the countries are cashing in too. Pakistani and Indian TV news channels are providing wall-to-wall coverage. In recent weeks, TV commercials in both countries used patriotic fervor to poke fun at each other. Local authorities and private companies in both the countries have announced that they would set up giant screens in some city centers and inside shopping malls. Fans want more For many fans, this clash holds more value than any other sporting event in the world — and they want more of it. Duckett’s 165 powers England to 351 against Australia In India’s western city of Mumbai, cricket coach Anil Sawant plans to watch the game at a clubhouse along with his friends on a giant screen. “These matches should take place often,” 57-year-old Sawant said, as his students honed their skills during practice at the city’s Shivaji Park ground — a favorite for cricketers of all ages. Mohammad Ahmed, a 27-year-old accountant, has also planned to host seven of his friends at his home in Pakistan’s Rawalpindi city. All of them will watch the game on a big screen and he plans to serve them special chicken biryani. “And of course French fries and soft drinks will be on the menu too,” Ahmed said with a smile.