A divided Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday declared former President Donald Trump ineligible for the White House under the U.S. Constitutionās insurrection clause and removed him from the stateās presidential primary ballot, setting up a likely showdown in the nationās highest court to decide whether the front-runner for the GOP nomination can remain in the race.
The decision from a court whose justices were all appointed by Democratic governors marks the first time in history that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate.
āA majority of the court holds that Trump is disqualified from holding the office of president under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment,ā the court wrote in its 4-3 decision.
Trump calls Biden the ādestroyerā of democracy
Coloradoās highest court overturned a ruling from a district court judge who found that Trump incited an insurrection for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, but said he could not be barred from the ballot because it was unclear that the provision was intended to cover the presidency.
The court stayed its decision until Jan. 4, or until the U.S. Supreme Court rules on the case. Colorado officials say the issue must be settled by Jan. 5, the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.
āWe do not reach these conclusions lightly,ā wrote the courtās majority. āWe are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.ā
Trumpās attorneys had promised to appeal any disqualification immediately to the nation's highest court, which has the final say about constitutional matters.
Trump's business and political ambitions poised to converge as he testifies in New York civil case
Trump's legal spokeswoman Alina Habba said in a statement Tuesday night: āThis ruling, issued by the Colorado Supreme Court, attacks the very heart of this nationās democracy. It will not stand, and we trust that the Supreme Court will reverse this unconstitutional order.ā
Trump didn't mention the decision during a rally Tuesday evening in Waterloo, Iowa, but his campaign sent out a fundraising email citing what it called a ātyrannical ruling.ā
Republican National Committee chairwoman Ronna McDaniel labeled the decision āElection interferenceā and said the RNCās legal team intends to help Trump fight the ruling.
Trump lost Colorado by 13 percentage points in 2020 and doesnāt need the state to win next yearās presidential election. But the danger for the former president is that more courts and election officials will follow Coloradoās lead and exclude Trump from must-win states.
Dozens of lawsuits have been filed nationally to disqualify Trump under Section 3, which was designed to keep former Confederates from returning to government after the Civil War. It bars from office anyone who swore an oath to āsupportā the Constitution and then āengaged in insurrection or rebellionā against it, and has been used only a handful of times since the decade after the Civil War.
āI think it may embolden other state courts or secretaries to act now that the bandage has been ripped off,ā Derek Muller, a Notre Dame law professor who has closely followed the Section 3 cases, said after Tuesday's ruling. āThis is a major threat to Trumpās candidacy.ā
The Colorado case is the first where the plaintiffs succeeded. After a weeklong hearing in November, District Judge Sarah B. Wallace found that Trump indeed had āengaged in insurrectionā by inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, and her ruling that kept him on the ballot was a fairly technical one.
Trumpās attorneys convinced Wallace that, because the language in Section 3 refers to āofficers of the United Statesā who take an oath to āsupportā the Constitution, it must not apply to the president, who is not included as an āofficer of the United Statesā elsewhere in the document and whose oath is to āpreserve, protect and defendā the Constitution.
The provision also says offices covered include senator, representative, electors of the president and vice president, and all others āunder the United States,ā but doesnāt name the presidency.
The stateās highest court didnāt agree, siding with attorneys for six Colorado Republican and unaffiliated voters who argued that it was nonsensical to imagine that the framers of the amendment, fearful of former confederates returning to power, would bar them from low-level offices but not the highest one in the land.
āPresident Trump asks us to hold that Section 3 disqualifies every oathbreaking insurrectionist except the most powerful one and that it bars oath-breakers from virtually every office, both state and federal, except the highest one in the land,ā the courtās majority opinion said. āBoth results are inconsistent with the plain language and history of Section 3.ā
The left-leaning group that brought the Colorado case, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, hailed the ruling.
āOur Constitution clearly states that those who violate their oath by attacking our democracy are barred from serving in government,ā its president, Noah Bookbinder, said in a statement.
Trumpās attorneys also had urged the Colorado high court to reverse Wallaceās ruling that Trump incited the Jan. 6 attack. His lawyers argued the then-president had simply been using his free speech rights and hadnāt called for violence. Trump attorney Scott Gessler also argued the attack was more of a āriotā than an insurrection.
That met skepticism from several of the justices.
āWhy isnāt it enough that a violent mob breached the Capitol when Congress was performing a core constitutional function?ā Justice William W. Hood III said during the Dec. 6 arguments. āIn some ways, that seems like a poster child for insurrection.ā
In the ruling issued Tuesday, the court's majority dismissed the arguments that Trump wasnāt responsible for his supportersā violent attack, which was intended to halt Congress' certification of the presidential vote: āPresident Trump then gave a speech in which he literally exhorted his supporters to fight at the Capitol,ā they wrote.
Colorado Supreme Court Justices Richard L. Gabriel, Melissa Hart, Monica MƔrquez and Hood ruled for the petitioners. Chief Justice Brian D. Boatright dissented, arguing the constitutional questions were too complex to be solved in a state hearing. Justices Maria E. Berkenkotter and Carlos Samour also dissented.
āOur government cannot deprive someone of the right to hold public office without due process of law,ā Samour wrote in his dissent. āEven if we are convinced that a candidate committed horrible acts in the past ā dare I say, engaged in insurrection ā there must be procedural due process before we can declare that individual disqualified from holding public office.ā
The Colorado ruling stands in contrast with the Minnesota Supreme Court, which last month decided that the state party can put anyone it wants on its primary ballot. It dismissed a Section 3 lawsuit but said the plaintiffs could try again during the general election.
In another 14th Amendment case, a Michigan judge ruled that Congress, not the judiciary, should decide whether Trump can stay on the ballot. That ruling is being appealed. The liberal group behind those cases, Free Speech For People, also filed another lawsuit in Oregon seeking to bounce Trump from the ballot there.
Both groups are financed by liberal donors who also support President Joe Biden. Trump has blamed the president for the lawsuits against him, even though Biden has no role in them, saying his rival is ādefacing the constitutionā to try to end his campaign.
Trumpās allies rushed to his defense, slamming the decision as āun-Americanā and āinsaneā and part of a politically-motivated effort to destroy his candidacy.
āFour partisan Democrat operatives on the Colorado Supreme Court think they get to decide for all Coloradans and Americans the next presidential election,ā House Republican Conference Chair Elise Stefanik said in a statement.