United News of Bangladesh

Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB) has observed that old patterns of the influence of money, religion, muscle power, patriarchy and majoritarian dominance have persisted in the elections, while imprudent actions by the government and the Election Commission have created unnecessary controversy surrounding the referendum. Although initial signs of healthy competition were visible, political parties and candidates have gradually maintained the old political settlements marked by violence in electoral activities. As a result, conflicts among parties and alliances, intra-party rivalries, unhealthy competition for power and violence have been increasing steadily. These remarks were made today at a press conference held at TIB’s Dhanmondi office to present “Pre-Election and Referendum Situation: TIB’s Observations.” TIB failed to recognise work on reforms: Finance Adviser The observations were presented today at a press conference organised by Transparency International Bangladesh (TIB), titled “Pre-Election and Referendum Situation: TIB’s Observations,” held at TIB’s Dhanmondi office. Speakers included TIB Executive Director Dr. Iftekharuzzaman; Adviser–Executive Management Prof. Dr. Sumaiya Khair; Director, Research and Policy, Muhammad Badiuzzaman; and Director, Outreach and Communication, Mohammad Tauhidul Islam. A section of the report was presented by Senior Research Fellow Md. Mahfuzul Haque. According to TIB, alongside electoral violence, anti-election activities by fallen authoritarian forces have increased instability risks. Political parties and candidates not only continued using money, religion, muscle power, patriarchy, and majoritarian influence, but the use of money and religion has intensified. Violations of the electoral code of conduct persisted, reflecting the Election Commission’s lack of effective action. Despite the July Charter’s pledge for 5% women candidates, women were largely overlooked. Within 24 hours of the election schedule, a potential candidate was killed, and attacks, shootings, and killings of political activists and rivals continued nationwide, raising concerns over law enforcement inaction. Mismanagement by the Commission also temporarily exposed the personal data of 14,000 journalists applying for registration, threatening their safety.    Hasina named in 663 cases over July Uprising, 453 on murder charges: TIB According to TIB’s observations, well before the approved campaign period, political parties and candidates began electioneering in violation of the Wall Writing and Poster Control Act, 2012 (Sections 3 & 4) by putting up posters and campaign materials on walls, poles, vehicles, and other places. In other words, all candidates violated some aspect of the electoral code of conduct. Large amounts of money were spent by prospective candidates even before the official campaign period, and 33.8% of candidates have already exceeded the prescribed spending limit, averaging BDT 11,961,310 per candidate between 4 December 2025 and 1 February 2026. Allegations of cash distribution by influential political parties to sway voters have also emerged. Broadcast coverage of election-related campaigning shows dominance by one party, occupying about 67.25% of total coverage, while referendum campaigning received only 7.56% of coverage on BTV. Violence has also accompanied campaigning: in one constituency, clashes between two parties led to a death, and high-risk districts saw more frequent conflicts. In Barisal Division, the rate of clashes increased from 30.9% before the schedule announcement to 43.8% afterward; in Rajshahi, it dropped from 22.2% to 15.5%, and in Dhaka from 22.3% to 12.3%. Barisal recorded the highest level of clashes, while Sylhet recorded the lowest. Regarding the referendum, TIB observed that the government’s indecision—due to opposing positions of influential political parties—and the drafting of the ordinance aimed at pleasing both sides created confusion and controversy regarding the referendum and the concerns surrounding it. It is unclear whether any consultation or coordination occurred between the government and the Election Commission during the ordinance’s drafting and the promotion of a “Yes” vote. Further debate arose when, 18 days into the government’s campaign, the Election Commission issued instructions to government employees, raising questions about the legality and prudence of the directives. Had the Commission consulted the government before issuing the ordinance, its independence would not have been questioned and unnecessary confusion avoided.    Presenting TIB’s observations on the overall electoral environment, TIB Executive Director Dr. Iftekharuzzaman said, “Election campaign expenditures of most candidates have exceeded the prescribed spending limits. At the same time, the misuse of religious content in campaign activities has been strongly evident, which is negatively affecting the values of Bangladesh. As a result, women’s political participation and, more broadly, the concept of equal rights for women have come under threat. Meanwhile, initiatives to ensure the safety and equal rights of marginalised communities, voters from diverse religious, ethnic, gender, social and cultural identities, as well as persons with disabilities, and to create an enabling environment for their participation in voting, have been jeopardised.” Dr. Zaman further stated, “Despite widespread violations of the code of conduct and various irregularities by parties and candidates at almost every stage of the election—including both online and offline campaigning—the Election Commission has largely overlooked these issues due to capacity constraints. Adequate coordination has not been established with digital platforms such as Meta or Google. Even when candidates have conducted campaigns in violation of the platforms’ own policies, the controversial content has not been removed, as business interests appear to be involved.” Reminding all stakeholders of their responsibilities during the election period, Dr. Zaman said, “In the past, people have been deprived of their voting rights; both ordinary citizens and political parties have been victims. Bearing this experience in mind, elections must be treated as genuine elections, and political parties must demonstrate the willingness to accept the people’s verdict. If our leaders—from the grassroots to the highest levels—embrace this spirit, we believe that the election can be conducted in a free, fair and peaceful manner. At the same time, it is expected that the Election Commission, the government, political parties and law enforcement agencies will properly fulfil their respective responsibilities to ensure that all voters—irrespective of ethnicity, religion, race, minority status, gender, age or disability—can exercise their voting rights free from fear, intimidation and security concerns.” Regarding the referendum, TIB ED further stated, “In accordance with the mandate provided by the July uprising, it is the responsibility of the government to play the necessary role in securing a ‘Yes’ verdict in the referendum on the July Charter. There was no legal or rational basis for the Election Commission’s disagreement in fulfilling this role. However, since government officials are legally under the authority of the Election Commission after the announcement of the election schedule, the government interfered unnecessarily in the Commission’s jurisdiction by issuing directives to promote a ‘Yes’ vote without obtaining prior consent from the Commission—even though such promotion was considered justified. As a result of this interference, or for other considerations, the Election Commission adopted unnecessary and controversial measures in this case based on a misinterpretation of the law. Moreover, by inappropriately imposing decisions on various stakeholders—including NGOs and banks alongside government officials—the government has called its own position into question. Overall, both the government and the Election Commission have demonstrated failure in performing their expected roles in organising the historic referendum in a proper and effective manner.” Noting that a significant majority of the proposals in the July Charter—written in blood—particularly those relating to the establishment of good governance, prevention of abuse of power and corruption, protection of political and civil rights, and the commitment to equal rights for all regardless of party affiliation, opinion, religion, ethnicity, gender or other forms of diversity—reflect TIB’s long-standing research-based expectations and policy advocacy, the Executive Director announced TIB’s position in favour of a ‘Yes’ vote in the referendum. TIB slams draft media ordinances as ‘mockery’ of free press