We were aware of these failures all along. But we ignored them and let them grow worse each day. We knew about global warming, and that it is worsening as well as about wealth concentration, and that it is getting worse.

We knew about the problems of poverty, healthcare, deforestation, plastic pollution, gender inequality, and numerous other issues. We knew how to solve them. But we did not mobilise our capabilities to end these problems.

Why? One explanation may be: we are so "addicted" to the present system that we do not want to disturb it.

No going back

The Covid-19 pandemic has stopped the economic machine. All nations are desperately preparing themselves to make the economic engine run at its maximum capacity again and take the economy back to the pre-pandemic level.

My question is why should we want to take the economy back to where we left off a year back?

We know that our pre-pandemic economic journey was taking us to the finishing line of our existence on this planet; it made human beings one of the most endangered species.

I strongly feel that our decision should be the opposite. Our firm decision should be: "no going back." I find it insane to go back to a suicidal path.

We are lucky that the pandemic has opened a window of opportunity by stalling the economic machine. Now it is easier for us to turn the situation around. This opportunity may not be available to us over many future generations. We must not miss this opportunity to make changes.

Going back will mean working with the same system, same infrastructure, same concepts, same goals of businesses – resulting in increasing global warming, more wealth concentration, and soon making the planet unliveable for human beings.

This is the time to redesign. The most important step in the redesigning process would be to create options for people.

Our present system does not offer any options. Its obstinacy and rigidity have taken away the capacity for self-corrections. If we replace it with a system that will give options to every person on all basic economic decisions, the corrective mechanism will come into play and steer the system in the right direction.

It is difficult to orient the older generation to get used to having options and making their own decisions as they were never introduced to these options.

The younger generation may be introduced to these options as they grow up. The education system will have to take the responsibility to introduce options in life right from the earliest stage.

Students will learn about the choices they have to make and gradually make up their minds on which option to take and how to navigate life through ever-present options.

They will learn the personal implications of each option and at the same time the societal implications emerging from each decision. These choices will gradually shape the future of the world in which they will live, and the world they will hand over to the future generation.

Education system should be at the centre

The education system has to play a key role in the transition process. Schools at all levels should make it clear to the students that nothing is engraved in stone as far as our economy and society are concerned.

Economics is a software made of rules to tie up our concepts and to arrive at personal and societal goals we set for ourselves. We are fully capable of designing an economy appropriate for the goals that we set for the future.

Goals come first. If we are not getting the desired outcome we should not submit ourselves to the wrong outcomes, we should fire the "software engineers" who designed it, and build a new software to get the job done.

The economy is not something set by nature. It is a human creation to get things done according to their objectives. We are the masters of our objectives. The rest is to get the right people to set the rules, institutions, and legal frameworks.

If we want to change our objectives, we change the rules of economics by creating appropriate institutions and laws. If we decide to make sure financial services must be available to all people in a financially sustainable way, we abandon the banking system which is not capable of doing that and create another system of banking.

The most important thing is to decide what we want. Today our education system does not involve itself in such issues. It only tells the students what exists, giving the impression that these are unalterable coordinates of life.

The most important step in redesigning the economic system would be to give people options. The present system does not offer many options.

The present economic system is a job-centric no-option system. We can create a better system that will give options to every single person regarding basic economic decisions. Their combined decisions will constitute the global direction of the economy.

These options can be introduced through our education system which will prepare the young people for the choices that are available to them, and how to choose from the options that appear before them. This will replace the present job-centric, no-option education system.

To begin with, the education system should install the purpose of life as the central issue of education. I try to draw the attention of the designers of educational programmes to leave aside one week every year at every level of education to undertake one simple exercise.

Students of each class will spend one week in an intensive consultation and debate to come up with a broad outline of the features of the world that they would like to create. Highlights of these decisions should be kept in record to make it the starting point for next year's debate.

Teachers, each year, may bring new issues for the consideration of the class. In other words, as long as students remain in the academic system they will remain engaged in this debate.

Educational institutions will have to make it clear to their students that life becomes worthwhile when it has found a purpose. Purpose leads to actions.

The search for the purpose should be the central theme of the education system. By the time students finish their schooling they should be ready with firmed up purposes, or at least have narrowed down the appealing alternatives.

Young people should be told that they have the power to create the world they want. They should be told that they are not passengers on this spaceship earth – sitting in first class, business class and economy class seats. They are the pilots in the cockpit.

They can take this world in any direction they want. Designing the destination is closely connected to defining the purpose of life. Students must find a generally agreed destination in mind. The world will drift into a disaster, else.

The education system should communicate to students that nothing is impossible for human beings if someone leads them to a firm decision to achieve it.

Our education system must be redesigned to change its present orientation of producing "job-ready" young people to producing "life-ready" young people.

Students should be told that all human beings are born entrepreneurs, packed with unlimited creative capacity. The journey of life is a process of consistently unleashing one's potential to the fullest limit. Taking a job stops that process.

Job is about serving others' wishes. It is about re-tooling oneself according to someone else's specifications. This is almost like squeezing a giant human being into a little slot of a job, which gives very little space for self-discovery. A job makes you spend your entire life as per the requirements of some people above you.

Job or entrepreneurship

The education system must offer alternative pathways for preparing students to enter their lives. A student can choose one of the two tracks – the job track, for those students who have already decided to take up jobs as their career, or the entrepreneurial track, to prepare students to become entrepreneurs. There will be a third track for students who wish to decide later. This will be a track to explore both options.

New economics will be built around new concepts which will offer options, it will lead to building new institutions, and designing new laws to create new institutions. The most important feature of this new economics will be to offer options where options did not previously exist at all.

For example, new economics will begin with the new image of a human being. It will be a big departure from the classic image given by old economics.

Old economics conceptualised a human being as someone driven by self-interest. That became the fountainhead for arriving at conclusions that led to so many disastrous policy decisions. It converted human beings into money-making robots. It took away options from people. It turned human beings into profit-maximising economic robots.

Instead of telling students that human beings are driven by self-interest only, the new education system will tell them that human beings are driven by two interests: self-interest and collective interest. Adding the concept of collective interest in human beings brings a fundamental change in economics and our relationship with the wider world.

With the new concept of human beings with dual interests, we will need two concepts of businesses each to go with each orientation of human beings. In the world of self-interest driven human beings, there is no need for choice. Their role is fixed. All they aim at is the maximisation of personal profit.

The new education system, consistent with new economic thinking, will offer options in business. Students will be told that there are two choices in business: personal profit-maximising business as consumers and collective problem-solving business.

Serving collective interest needs a completely different kind of business – a business dedicated to solving collective problems without any intention of making personal profit. We call it social business.

An entrepreneur is free to choose how much of his resources he is willing to put in each category of business – how much in personal profit-seeking business and how much in collective interest seeking business.

There is a clear conflict between collective interest and personal profit. The education system has to prepare the students to weigh these two conflicting interests and take appropriate decisions to maximise their happiness. These options are mutually exclusive in each business, but not so to the entrepreneur who owns these businesses. An entrepreneur can pick one or the other, or both. Since the objectives of these businesses are different, the entrepreneurs must run these two businesses separately.

A world of three zeros

The overriding responsibility of the new education system is to prepare students who will create a new world free from pressing problems such as global warming, wealth concentration, and an upsurge of massive unemployment. They will be inspired to take the challenge of creating a world free from all these problems, a world of three zeros – zero net carbon emission, zero wealth concentration, and zero unemployment.

Global warming is getting worse every day. It is an existential threat to the world. The more we know, the more shocking it gets.

However, in everyday life, we show no sign of getting shocked or feeling threatened. We keep ourselves insulated by thinking: "I cannot do anything about it. Our government never asked me to do anything about it. They must be doing something to take care of this. If it was so bad, they would have warned us. My job is to carry on with my life."

We now have a situation where we know very well that our house is burning, but we are not worried about it. We remain in denial mode. We keep ourselves busy with our non-stop partying inside the burning house.

We are determined to ignore the fact that our partying itself is continuously fuelling the fire. We know very well that our partying is tightening a self-destructive cycle around us. To continue with our partying, we keep coming up with unconvincing excuses. These excuses range from the blame-game to total denial.

We know very well who is causing global warming. We are causing it ourselves. We are doing it through our businesses, through our decisions as consumers, and the policies of our governments.

Each of us as an individual is responsible to stop the fire, it does not matter whether the government asks for it or not. We have very little time to stop this fire before everything turn into ashes. The point of no return is approaching very fast.

Wealth expanding, keeps moving away from people

Parallel to global warming wealth concentration continues to get worse every moment. It has turned the economic engine itself into a ticking time-bomb. It can destroy us at any time.

Our economic engine has already delivered 99% of the global wealth to the lucky 1% of the global population and this share is increasing every second.

And 99% of people, who own only 1% of the global wealth, are left at the bottom end of income level; half of them are under an income of $5.50-a-day. The remaining population is not too far above them. This has created a situation where all the wealth of the world has gotten totally disconnected from the people.

People are abandoned at the bottom, while wealth is not only piled up high in the sky, it also keeps moving away from them at a sustained speed. Is there any sign of this being different someday? Not within the present economic system.

People-wealth disconnect will continue to grow until it ends in an explosion. But we do not discuss this problem like we discuss global warming. We have no other way but to accept that it is a result of the wrong design of the present economy.

We need to design a new economic engine that will bring wealth towards people, not push it away from them as the present engine does. The new engine has to be designed to bring people and wealth together and keep them together under all circumstances.

To slow down and ultimately reverse the process of wealth moving away from people, we have to focus on the vehicle which carries it out. The financial system is this vehicle that multiplies the wealth at the top. We have to redesign it drastically.

The entire financial system is built on the principle that "the more you have the more you get." If you are from a $5.50-a-day family, its door is closed to you.

New economics has to be built on the reverse principle: if you are from the bottom families you will get the highest attention.

The commitment of the new financial system will be to turn any willing young person, girl or boy, into a successful entrepreneur. We must make it so that nobody in society can say that I could not become an entrepreneur because I did not have the money.

This is a sector where social businesses have to play a critical role. Not only the new economics will need new financial institutions to serve the people at the bottom, but it also has to have a wide geographical or virtual presence.

One cautionary note to add: we must avoid creating profit-maximising financial institutions for serving the people at the bottom. These types of financial institutions develop a tendency to turn into loan-sharking institutions. They soon find out this a fertile ground for hiking up profit by various means.

This space for financial institutions must be covered by social business financial institutions. The best way to address this problem is to create a separate law for creating social business micro entrepreneurs' banks and other social business financial institutions. There should be social business venture capital funds and social business investment funds.

The creation of social business venture capital funds is extremely important to provide equity financing to all young people, girls and boys so that they can all start their lives as entrepreneurs, not as job-seekers.

Global warming and the ever-widening distance between wealth and people have become threats to the existence of people on this planet. There is another threat in the offing. This comes from the technology side, from artificial intelligence.

Driven by an intensive search for profit-maximisation, businesses found out how quickly they could add to their profit by replacing human beings with artificial intelligence in all professions. This is the ultimate victory of wealth owners when they will own 100% of the wealth, removing all other income earners from the economy. The logic of profit maximisation cannot stop at the ownership of 99% of global wealth. It has to go all the way to 100%.

On the technological front, we must make sure we stop artificial intelligence from replacing human beings at work. Artificial intelligence can be a great blessing on many other fronts, but its mission to replace human beings at work is definitely a curse for all human beings.

Our teenagers have understood the situation much better than us elders. They are marching on the street every Friday, calling themselves "Fridays For Future". They are boldly accusing their parents, and other older people – that older people have been irresponsible, selfish, and they have stolen the future from the teenagers.

Teenagers have recognised the threat and have spoken out about it. They did not wait for their governments or their schools to tell them what to do about global warming. It is time for the older generation to respond to them by recognising the urgency and putting all human activities on red alert for security check.

Teenagers got it right

I admire the awareness shown by the teenagers while the older generations are taking a breath after their success on the Paris Agreement. The accord is a great accomplishment. The goals set by it are an important development in policymaking and providing a framework for action.

Government actions are well-defined. But it has not energised the people into action. People are at the centre of creating a problem in various roles. They must take responsibility to face the problem. People cannot go on with their partying. Soon we will have to come to a People's Agreement to address the core of the problem.

Young people of today inspire me. The present generation of young people is the most powerful one in the whole human history, not because they are smarter, but because they start their lives with technology in their hands, even in the hands of poor rural girls. These technologies were not available to the most fortunate of the richest countries just twenty years back.

Today each young person has the power to change the world. Each young person has the potential of the genie of Aladeen's lamp. He or she is capable of doing impossible things.

The new education system has to make them aware that they are different from any of the previous generations, even the youth of their parents' generation. The new education system will not only make this generation aware of their enormous power, but it will also prepare them to use their power to its fullest.

The education system will have to make sure that young people do not waste their power by not using it, or using it for wrong purposes.

Imagination is the power

The new education system should bring up imagination as the centrepiece of education. It will encourage young people to imagine without boundaries. It will be a different kind of imagination than the imagination which takes people away from reality. This will be the imagination to build a new reality.

 Students should be driven by a constant search for "why not?" They must believe that if they imagine someday it will happen as they have the power to make it happen. If they do not imagine, it will never happen.

Science fiction is a good example. It provides power to the inventors and challenges theories. Students may be encouraged to create social fictions to think in concrete images and actions. Social fictions will inspire the creators of them and the viewers of them to ask the question: "why not?"

Young people, who will very soon bring massive changes in the whole world, are passing through the educational institutions right now. Are these institutions encouraging them to think outrageous thoughts, and inspiring them to stand up for the causes they picked as the right ones?

The new education system must be prepared to give the new generation the best environment to get ready to build a new world. The time has come for making big decisions to make big changes.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and views of UNB.