United News of Bangladesh

Authorities in northern Idaho lifted a shelter-in-place order Sunday night after discovering the body of a man believed to be behind a sniper ambush that killed two firefighters and wounded another, officials said. The Kootenai County Sheriff’s Office confirmed a tactical team found the deceased man near a firearm but did not release his identity or details about the weapon. A news conference is expected later to provide further information. The deadly ambush occurred as firefighters were responding to a brush fire on Canfield Mountain, just north of Coeur d’Alene, around 1:30 p.m. Within 30 minutes, gunfire erupted, turning the scene chaotic. Sheriff Bob Norris said deputies came under active sniper fire for several hours. “We’re dealing with a shooter hiding in the rugged terrain, armed with a high-powered rifle,” Norris said earlier, adding that his deputies were instructed to return fire. First responders made frantic radio calls for assistance: “Everybody’s shot up here... send law enforcement now,” one dispatcher was heard saying. Three victims were transported to Kootenai Health Hospital, where two were pronounced dead and one remains under treatment, hospital spokesperson Kim Anderson said. The injured firefighter’s condition has not been disclosed. 2 dead and at least 3 injured in Las Vegas gym shooting, police say Governor Brad Little condemned the violence, calling it a “heinous direct assault on our brave firefighters.” He urged Idahoans to keep the victims and their families in their prayers. The sniper appeared to have exploited the mountainous, wooded terrain, which is popular for hiking and biking. Authorities ordered residents to stay away from the Canfield Mountain Trailhead and Nettleton Gulch Road area, located about 6.5 kilometers north of downtown Coeur d’Alene. Although the lockdown was lifted following the discovery of the body, the sheriff’s office warned residents to stay alert as the wildfire continued to burn in the area. The FBI also deployed technical teams and tactical support to assist local authorities, Deputy Director Dan Bongino confirmed. State lawmakers expressed outrage over the attack. “We are horrified by the murder of two firefighters and shocked by this vicious assault on first responders,” Idaho House Republican leaders said in a statement, offering prayers for the victims and their families. Local resident Bruce Deming, whose property borders the mountain trail system, described the confusion when he saw smoke but no firefighting aircraft. He later learned helicopters stayed grounded due to fears of being targeted by gunfire. Deming guided deputies to a trail near his property leading toward the fire and sniper’s suspected location. “I just don’t want to wake up in the middle of the night wondering if someone’s prowling around my place,” he added. 10 killed in shooting at adult education center in Sweden Canfield Mountain, covered in trees and heavy brush, provides direct access to national forest trails. Wildfires are a frequent concern for the region, made worse by the rugged landscape and dry summer conditions. Source: With inputs from agency 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe has told U.S. lawmakers that recent American military strikes destroyed Iran's only metal conversion facility, delivering a significant blow to Tehran's nuclear program that could take years to recover from, a U.S. official said Sunday. Speaking on condition of anonymity due to the classified nature of the information, the official confirmed Ratcliffe’s remarks were made during a closed-door briefing with members of Congress last week. The revelations come amid continued scrutiny from Democratic lawmakers over the extent of the damage inflicted by U.S. and Israeli strikes, which preceded last Tuesday’s ceasefire with Iran. “It was obliteration like nobody’s ever seen before,” President Donald Trump told Fox News Channel's “Sunday Morning Futures,” claiming the strikes brought an end to Iran's nuclear ambitions “at least for a period of time.” Ratcliffe reportedly told lawmakers that while most of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile is believed to remain buried beneath the rubble at Isfahan and Fordo—two of the main nuclear sites targeted—the loss of Iran's metal conversion capabilities severely limits its ability to produce a nuclear weapon. Iran could resume uranium enrichment within months: IAEA Metal conversion, the process of turning enriched uranium gas into dense metal for the explosive core of a bomb, is a critical step in nuclear weapons development. The destroyed facility was located at the Isfahan nuclear complex. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), echoed those assessments on CBS' “Face the Nation,” stating that Iran’s nuclear sites with capabilities for uranium treatment, conversion, and enrichment suffered "important" damage. However, he cautioned that “some is still standing” and full damage assessments depend on Iran granting access to inspectors. “Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared,” Grossi added, warning that Iran retains the technical knowledge to restart its program if it chooses. Despite the cautious statements from international officials, Trump and his administration have maintained that Iran’s nuclear capabilities were effectively neutralized. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the targeted sites as “destroyed,” while the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency’s preliminary report acknowledged significant damage to Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan but stopped short of confirming total destruction. Israeli officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, also believe Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity has been neutralized for an extended period. They attribute this to the loss of critical facilities, damage to Iran’s missile production infrastructure, the elimination of key scientists, and the near-collapse of Iran's air defense systems during the 12-day assault. Ratcliffe also informed lawmakers that Iran’s air defense network was "shattered," making any future attempts to revive its nuclear program vulnerable to further Israeli strikes. Secretary of State Marco Rubio reinforced the significance of the destroyed metal conversion site during last week’s NATO summit. “You can’t build a nuclear weapon without a conversion facility,” Rubio said, adding that satellite imagery shows the location has been completely obliterated. “It’s wiped out.” Iran reports at least 71 dead in Israeli strike on Evin prison While Iran’s physical capabilities have been significantly degraded, Grossi and other experts warn that Iran’s technical expertise remains intact. “You cannot undo the knowledge or the capacity they have,” Grossi said, stressing the importance of renewed diplomatic efforts to resolve the nuclear dispute. Source: Agency 

Elon Musk intensified his criticism of President Donald Trump’s extensive tax and spending cuts package on Saturday, warning that the legislation, which Senate Republicans are urgently trying to advance, would jeopardize American jobs and future industries. “The latest version of the Senate bill will wipe out millions of American jobs and deal a massive strategic blow to the country,” Musk posted on X, hours before the Senate held a procedural vote to initiate debate on the nearly 1,000-page bill. “It props up outdated industries while undermining those critical to the future.” The billionaire CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, who also celebrated his birthday Saturday, later called the bill “political suicide for the Republican Party.” Musk’s latest remarks reignited a public feud with the administration he recently departed after serving as head of the Department of Government Efficiency. His comments further complicate efforts by Senate GOP leaders, who have been working intensely to secure enough votes to meet Trump’s goal of passing the bill by July 4th. Musk has been an outspoken opponent of Trump’s so-called “big, beautiful bill” for weeks. Shortly after stepping down from his government role last month — a departure marked by praise from Trump during a White House ceremony — Musk blasted the legislation as “bloated with pork” and labeled it a “disgusting abomination.” “Shame on those who voted for it — you know you betrayed your country,” he posted on X earlier this month. In another message, the Republican mega-donor hinted he might withdraw financial support from lawmakers he accused of “betraying the American people.” Their clash escalated when Musk suggested, without evidence, that Trump’s name surfaced in documents related to sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — a claim that fueled tensions despite their prior alliance. Musk later attempted to ease tensions, admitting that some of his previous remarks had “crossed the line.” Trump responded by downplaying the incident in an interview with The New York Post, saying, “These things happen. I don’t hold it against him.” Musk’s renewed attacks cast uncertainty over the temporary truce he and Trump had appeared to reach. The White House declined to comment on Musk’s latest statements. Since stepping away from politics, Musk has focused primarily on his business ventures, and his political clout has diminished. However, his financial backing — he contributed hundreds of millions to Trump’s 2024 campaign — underscores the influence he can wield if he reengages politically. While Musk refrained from directly targeting Trump on Saturday, the president increased pressure on Senate Republicans during an unusual evening session, criticizing holdouts like Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, accusing him of grandstanding with his opposition vote, and threatening to oppose his reelection. Despite the drama, the Senate narrowly passed the procedural hurdle late Saturday, allowing formal debate on the bill to begin.    

The United States has decided to withdraw its financial support from the global vaccine alliance Gavi, with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accusing the organisation of disregarding scientific evidence and eroding public trust. A pre-recorded video of Kennedy's remarks was played at a Gavi donor conference in Brussels on Wednesday where the alliance is seeking to raise at least $9 billion to fund its operations over the next five years. Gavi, a partnership that includes the World Health Organization (WHO), UNICEF, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and the World Bank, has facilitated the vaccination of over 1 billion children worldwide, preventing an estimated 18 million deaths. The U.S. has traditionally been one of Gavi's major donors, previously pledging $1 billion through 2030 before President Trump’s re-election. Kennedy criticized Gavi’s approach, calling for the alliance to “regain public trust and demonstrate accountability for the $8 billion the U.S. has provided since 2001.” He insisted that the organization must incorporate “the best available science, even when it challenges existing narratives,” and warned that no further U.S. funding would be forthcoming until those standards are met. A known vaccine skeptic, Kennedy also expressed concerns over Gavi and WHO’s collaboration with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic accusing them of “suppressing dissent, limiting free speech, and disregarding legitimate safety concerns.” Kennedy specifically questioned Gavi’s ongoing recommendations such as promoting COVID-19 vaccinations for pregnant women and funding the distribution of vaccines for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTP) in low-income countries. WHO and leading health authorities have consistently advocated for COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women, citing their elevated risk of severe illness. Kennedy, however, referenced research claiming that young girls vaccinated with the DTP shot faced higher mortality rates from other causes compared to unvaccinated peers. In response, Gavi emphasized its commitment to child health and safety, stating that its vaccine purchases are guided by WHO's independent expert recommendations. The alliance underscored that its decisions are rooted in rigorous scientific evaluation and public health needs. “Gavi’s investments are based on the best available science,” the organization said, adding that concerns raised about the DTP vaccine have been reviewed by global scientists, and that the vaccine has significantly contributed to reducing child mortality rates by half. Meanwhile, the UK government announced a renewed commitment of 1.25 billion pounds ($1.7 billion) to Gavi for 2026-2030. British officials said the funding would help protect up to 500 million children in some of the world’s most vulnerable regions from deadly diseases like meningitis, cholera, and measles.

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Muslim of South Asian descent, shocked the political establishment by defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in Tuesday’s Democratic mayoral primary, positioning himself to become the party’s candidate for the top job in America’s largest city. If Mamdani, a state assemblyman, wins the November election, he would be New York City’s first Muslim and first mayor of Indian origin. As the votes came in, Mamdani quoted Nelson Mandela in a social media post early Wednesday, saying: “It always seems impossible until it’s done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honoured to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City.” Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 following sexual harassment allegations, publicly conceded after calling Mamdani to congratulate him. “Tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani’s night, and he put together a great campaign,” Cuomo said at an event in Manhattan. “And he touched young people, and inspired them, and moved them, and got them to come out and vote. And he really ran a highly impactful campaign.” Political commentators see Mamdani’s likely win as a signal of broader shifts within the Democratic Party, still reeling from its defeat in the 2024 presidential and Congressional elections. How did Mamdani pull off the surprise win? In the first-choice tally of New York City’s ranked-choice Democratic mayoral primary on June 24, Mamdani secured 43.5 percent of the vote—about 432,000 votes—while Cuomo trailed with 36.4 percent, or roughly 361,800 votes. Progressive Comptroller Brad Lander finished third with 11.3 percent, with the rest of the votes split among minor candidates. As no candidate crossed the 50 percent mark initially, the ranked-choice system came into effect, eliminating lower-ranked contenders and redistributing their supporters’ next preferences. Reports suggest Mamdani benefited heavily from Lander’s progressive supporters, propelling him toward an eventual majority. Though final results may take days, Mamdani’s victory appears inevitable, reinforced by Cuomo’s concession. Zohran Mamdani stuns Cuomo, poised to be NYC’s first Muslim mayor Was Mamdani’s victory anticipated? Not according to polls. In the run-up to the primary, major surveys consistently showed Cuomo in the lead, although Mamdani’s numbers were rising. A Marist Poll conducted on June 18 placed Cuomo ahead with 38 percent of first-choice votes, while Mamdani trailed at 27 percent. That poll also projected Cuomo to ultimately win 55 percent in the ranked-choice rounds. Earlier, a May poll by Emerson College found Cuomo at 37 percent and Mamdani at just 17 percent. In April, a Siena/AARP poll showed Cuomo with 39 percent support to Mamdani’s 15 percent. Cuomo’s deep-rooted name recognition, boosted by his father Mario Cuomo’s legacy as a former state governor, coupled with a well-funded campaign, seemed to make him the frontrunner. However, Mamdani’s grassroots strategy, powered by volunteers, small-dollar donors, and high turnout from young voters, proved decisive—especially in working-class areas across Queens, Brooklyn, and parts of Manhattan. Despite critics, including Cuomo, portraying Mamdani as inexperienced and ill-equipped to handle the city’s complex governance, voters evidently disagreed. Who is Zohran Mamdani? Mamdani, a Democratic Socialist, was born in Kampala, Uganda, and moved to New York at age seven. He is the son of renowned Ugandan scholar Mahmood Mamdani and acclaimed Indian filmmaker Mira Nair. He holds a degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College in Maine. Before entering politics, Mamdani worked as a housing counselor, helping low-income New Yorkers avoid evictions. He was elected to the State Assembly in 2020, representing Astoria, Queens. Earlier this year, Mamdani married Syrian artist Rama Duwaji, whose work has been featured in The New Yorker, The Washington Post, and VICE. What is Mamdani’s position on Gaza? Mamdani is one of the most outspoken critics of Israel’s war in Gaza among American elected officials. On October 31, 2024, he posted on X: “I will always be clear in my language and based in facts: Israel is committing a genocide.” He is also a strong supporter of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which he links to “the core of my politics, which is non-violence.” One of the most talked-about moments of his campaign came in December 2024 during an interview with Mehdi Hasan, where Mamdani declared: “As mayor, I would have Netanyahu arrested if he came to New York!” “This is a city [where] our values are in line with international law. It’s time that our actions are also,” he added. Mamdani has faced criticism for his refusal to distance himself from the slogan “Globalize the Intifada,” which some Jewish leaders and conservatives have labeled anti-Semitic. In a June 2025 podcast appearance on The Bulwark, Mamdani responded: “As a Muslim man who grew up post 9/11, I’m all too familiar (with) the way in which Arabic words can be twisted, can be distorted, can be used to justify any kind of meaning.” He stressed the slogan is about global solidarity with oppressed peoples, not inciting violence. Cuomo’s campaign also targeted Mamdani’s Muslim identity and his pro-Palestinian stance, accusing him of anti-Semitism. New York hosts the world’s largest Jewish community outside of Israel. Addressing Islamophobic threats he received, Mamdani stated: “There is no room for anti-Semitism in this city or country.” He has repeatedly clarified that his criticisms are aimed at government policies, not at Jewish people. Trump says US-Iran talks expected next week as ceasefire holds His campaign was fuelled by more than 22,000 volunteers and endorsements from progressives such as Bernie Sanders, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the Working Families Party. What are Mamdani’s key proposals? Mamdani’s platform focuses on bold, progressive reforms aimed at wealth redistribution and public service expansion. Notable pledges include making all city buses free by 2027, citing successful fare-free transit pilots that improved ridership and safety. On housing, he has vowed to freeze rents on stabilized apartments, roll back rent hikes on city-owned properties, and create a Social Housing Development Agency to provide permanently affordable, publicly-owned homes. Mamdani also wants to establish municipally-run grocery stores in each borough to improve access to affordable food in underserved communities. His education plans include expanding free meal programs to city colleges and offering universal childcare and early learning programs. To fund these initiatives, he proposes increasing the corporate tax rate from 7.25 percent to 11.5 percent and introducing a 2 percent surcharge on individuals earning over $1 million annually, which his campaign estimates could raise $9.4 billion per year. On public safety, Mamdani advocates reallocating resources from the NYPD to a new Department of Community Safety, comprising mental health experts, crisis responders, and outreach teams. What’s next — is Mamdani set to be mayor? The general election is scheduled for November 4. Mamdani will face Republican Curtis Sliwa, who lost the 2021 mayoral race by a wide margin. Given New York’s strong Democratic majority—where Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than six to one—Mamdani is widely expected to secure victory and become the city’s next mayor. The last Republican to win the mayor’s office was Michael Bloomberg in 2001, who later became an Independent during his second term. Source: With inputs from Al Jazeera  

Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old Muslim of South Asian descent, delivered a political upset by defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor on Tuesday, positioning himself to make history as the city’s first Muslim and Indian-origin mayor. If elected in November, Mamdani, currently a state assemblyman, would be the first person from his background to lead the United States' largest city. As the vote tally unfolded, Mamdani took to social media early Wednesday, quoting Nelson Mandela: “It always seems impossible until it’s done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honoured to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City.” Cuomo, who resigned as governor in 2021 following a sexual harassment scandal, publicly conceded the race and praised Mamdani at a Manhattan event. “Tonight was Assemblyman Mamdani’s night, and he put together a great campaign,” Cuomo said. “And he touched young people, and inspired them, and moved them, and got them to come out and vote. And he really ran a highly impactful campaign.” Israeli law enabling forcible transfer of Palestinians a war crime: UN Mamdani’s apparent victory is being seen by analysts as a signal of deeper shifts within the Democratic Party, still reeling from defeats in the 2024 presidential and Congressional elections. How Mamdani took the lead In the initial round of ranked-choice voting during the June 24 Democratic primary, Mamdani led with 43.5% of the vote—nearly 432,000 ballots cast—followed by Cuomo with 36.4%, or 361,800 votes. Comptroller Brad Lander finished third with 11.3%, while the remaining votes were distributed among other candidates. As no contender secured over 50% of the first-choice votes, New York’s ranked-choice system came into play, eliminating lower-ranked candidates and reallocating votes based on second-choice preferences. Mamdani gained significant support from Lander’s voter base and other progressives, propelling him toward the majority threshold. While the final certified results are pending, Cuomo’s concession makes Mamdani’s win all but certain. An unexpected result Mamdani's rise surprised many political observers. Leading up to the primary, most polls suggested Cuomo was the favourite, though they acknowledged Mamdani's growing support. A Marist Poll from June 18 showed Cuomo ahead with 38% of first-choice votes to Mamdani’s 27%. The same survey predicted Cuomo would eventually win with 55% after ranked-choice rounds. Similarly, a May poll by Emerson College gave Cuomo 37% and Mamdani just 17%. An April Siena/AARP poll had Cuomo even further ahead, with 39% compared to Mamdani’s 15%. Cuomo’s widespread name recognition, substantial campaign funds, and political lineage—his father Mario Cuomo also served as New York’s governor—appeared to give him the advantage. His campaign dominated TV ads and mailers across the city. Turkey welcomes Iran-Israel ceasefire, condemns Israeli attacks on Gaza But Mamdani's grassroots campaign, powered by volunteers, small donations, and a surge in young voter turnout, proved decisive. His appeal resonated with working-class New Yorkers, especially in Queens, Brooklyn, and parts of Manhattan. Cuomo and other critics argued Mamdani lacked the administrative skills for the complex mayoral role. Tuesday’s outcome showed voters disagreed. Who is Zohran Mamdani? Mamdani, a self-identified Democratic Socialist, is the son of renowned Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani and Indian filmmaker Mira Nair. Born in Kampala, he moved to New York at age seven and later earned a degree in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College in Maine. Before entering politics, Mamdani worked as a housing counselor assisting low-income families facing eviction. In 2020, he won a seat in the New York State Assembly representing Astoria, Queens. Earlier this year, he married Rama Duwaji, a 27-year-old Syrian artist whose work has appeared in outlets such as The New Yorker, The Washington Post, and VICE. Mamdani’s key proposals Mamdani has campaigned on an ambitious progressive agenda focused on wealth redistribution, expanded public services, and social reform. He has pledged to make all city buses free by 2027, citing pilot programs that increased ridership and reduced assaults on drivers. Housing is central to his platform, with plans for a rent freeze on rent-stabilized apartments, stronger tenant protections, and the creation of a Social Housing Development Agency to build publicly owned, permanently affordable homes. Mamdani has also proposed opening a city-run grocery store in every borough to ensure affordable, healthy food in underserved communities. His policies include expanding free meal programs to city colleges and introducing universal childcare and early education. Trump defends US strikes on Iran as intel assessment stirs debate To fund these initiatives, Mamdani plans to raise the corporate tax rate from 7.25% to 11.5% and implement a 2% surcharge on individuals earning over $1 million annually, projecting $9.4 billion in revenue. On public safety, Mamdani advocates reallocating resources from the NYPD to a new Department of Community Safety, staffed by mental health professionals and crisis responders. The road ahead New York City’s general mayoral election is scheduled for November 4, with Mamdani set to face Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, who previously lost the 2021 mayoral race. Once the primary results are finalized, Mamdani will officially become the Democratic nominee—a significant advantage in a city where Democrats outnumber Republicans by more than six to one. The last Republican to win the NYC mayoral race was Michael Bloomberg in 2001, who later became an Independent during his second term. Mamdani is now the overwhelming favourite to become New York City’s next mayor. Source: With inputs from Al Jazeera

President Donald Trump on Wednesday asserted that U.S. airstrikes delivered a major blow to Iran’s nuclear program, despite an early U.S. intelligence report suggesting the damage was minimal. “This was a devastating attack that left them reeling,” Trump said, as his administration mobilized senior officials to support his claim that Iran’s nuclear program had been “completely and fully obliterated.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed the leaked intelligence report — which indicated Iran’s nuclear activities may only face a short-term disruption of a few months — calling it “preliminary” and “low confidence.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio went further, labeling those who leaked the assessment as “professional stabbers.” The White House cited a statement from the Israel Atomic Energy Commission claiming Iran’s nuclear efforts had suffered a “many years” setback. Trump says US, Iran to talk next week with war over Assessing the real impact of the U.S. strikes remains challenging, fueling conflicting narratives that could influence American public opinion on Trump’s high-stakes decision to participate in Israel's offensive against Iran. The situation also raises questions about Trump's next moves in the region, where diplomatic steps may be necessary to prevent Iran from rebuilding its nuclear capabilities. Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but U.S. and Israeli leaders have accused Tehran of seeking nuclear weapons. One major target of the U.S. attack was Iran’s Fordo enrichment facility, located deep underground. According to the Israeli commission, the bombing rendered the site “inoperable.” That statement was distributed by both the White House and the office of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The American strikes on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure, along with Israeli attacks on other military nuclear sites, have “set back Iran’s ability to develop nuclear weapons by many years,” according to the joint statement. Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei confirmed to Al Jazeera that Iran’s nuclear sites suffered significant damage. “Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that’s for sure,” he admitted. The incident has reignited Trump’s longstanding tensions with intelligence agencies and leakers, whom he often accuses of belonging to a “deep state” aimed at sabotaging his agenda. He also harshly criticized media outlets reporting on the classified intelligence, calling them “scum” and “disgusting.” Trump argued that questioning the success of the strikes insults the U.S. military, noting that stealth bombers flew halfway around the globe to carry out precision attacks with bunker-busting munitions. “These reports are very unfair to the pilots who risked their lives for our country,” he said. A key unanswered question is whether enriched uranium — which could potentially be converted into nuclear weapons fuel — was removed from the targeted sites before the strikes. “I believe they didn’t have a chance to get anything out, because we acted fast,” Trump stated, adding that transporting such material is extremely difficult and dangerous. Classified briefings for lawmakers on the situation, initially scheduled for Tuesday, have been postponed to Thursday and Friday.  

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that US and Iranian officials will talk next week, continuing a dialogue that was interrupted by the recent war between Israel and Tehran, while a fragile ceasefire appeared to be holding. “I’ll tell you what, we’re going to talk with them next week, with Iran. We may sign an agreement, I don’t know," Trump told a press conference during the NATO summit in the Netherlands. Trump said he wasn't particularly interested in restarting negotiations with Iran, insisting that US strikes had destroyed its nuclear program, reports AP. “The way I look at it, they fought, the war is done,” he said. Iran has not acknowledged any talks taking place next week, though US Mideast envoy Steve Witkoff has said there has been direct and indirect communication between the countries. The fragile ceasefire gave rise to cautious hope for longer-term peace even as Tehran insisted it will not give up its nuclear program. Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire that took hold on Tuesday, the 12th day of the war, earlier told reporters at a NATO summit it was going “very well," adding that Iran was "not going to have a bomb and they’re not going to enrich." Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear program. In a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, its parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country’s cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN watchdog that has monitored the program for years. 'Daddy has to sometimes use strong language': Nato chief on Trump expletive Ahead of the vote, Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticized the IAEA for having “refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities” that the United States carried out on Sunday. “For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran will suspend cooperation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran’s peaceful nuclear program will move forward at a faster pace," Qalibaf told lawmakers. IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the US strikes, and Grossi said his inspectors need to re-assess the country’s stockpiles. “We need to return,” he said. “We need to engage.” French President Emmanuel Macron, whose country was part of the 2015 deal with Iran that restricted its nuclear program but began unraveling after Trump pulled the US out in his first term, said he hoped Tehran would come back to the table. Iran has long maintained that its nuclear program was peaceful, and US intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran is not actively pursuing a bomb. However, Israeli leaders have argued that Iran could quickly assemble a nuclear weapon. Israel is widely believed to be the only Middle Eastern country with nuclear weapons, which it has never acknowledged.

NATO leaders on Wednesday committed to a significant increase in defense spending following pressure from U.S. President Donald Trump while reiterating their “ironclad commitment” to defend one another if attacked. In a joint statement, all 32 members pledged to invest 5% of their GDP annually in core defense and security-related expenditures by 2035 to fulfill both national and collective defense responsibilities. Spain has already confirmed it will not be able to meet this target, calling it unrealistic, and several others have voiced doubts. However, the agreement includes a review in 2029 to assess progress and reevaluate the security situation regarding Russia. The leaders also reaffirmed NATO’s collective defense principle, stating “an attack on one is an attack on all.” The declaration came after Trump reignited uncertainty over whether the United States would stand by its allies. Despite underlying divisions, the unified statement reflects what NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte described as a “transformational” summit. However, the defense spending commitment places considerable financial demands on European allies and Canada. The increased military spending comes as the United States — NATO’s largest contributor — begins to shift its focus away from Europe to other regions, notably the Middle East and Indo-Pacific. Spain preemptively declared it would miss the 2035 goal, calling it “unreasonable.” Belgium and Slovakia have also expressed reservations, with Slovakia insisting it will determine its own defense budget independently. Economic struggles in many European countries, combined with Trump’s global tariff policies, may make it harder for allies to meet their new military obligations. Some nations are already cutting welfare programs and foreign aid to divert more funds to defense. On Tuesday, Trump criticized Spain for not committing to the spending targets, stating, “there’s a problem with Spain. Spain is not agreeing, which is very unfair to the rest of them, frankly.” He also took aim at Canada, calling it “a low payer.” During Trump’s first term in 2018, a NATO summit nearly collapsed over a similar defense spending dispute. Acknowledging the financial and political challenges, Rutte admitted, “these are difficult decisions. Let’s be honest. I mean, politicians have to make choices in scarcity. And this is not easy.” But he added, “given the threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative.” Iranian parliament back move to halt cooperation with IAEA Nations Near Russia Lead the Push Countries bordering Russia and Ukraine — including Poland, the Baltic States, and the Nordic nations — have pledged to meet the goal, along with major European powers like Britain, France, Germany, and the Netherlands. “This is a big win, I think, for both President Trump and I think it’s also a big win for Europe,” said Finnish President Alexander Stubb. “We’re witnessing the birth of a new NATO, which means a more balanced NATO.” Stubb noted that the new spending levels would mirror Cold War-era defense budgets. NATO allies began cutting military spending after the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, assuming a more peaceful era. In a nod to Trump’s political slogan, Lithuanian President Gitanas Nausėda remarked, “We should choose a motto, ‘make NATO great again.’” Following Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, NATO set 2% of GDP as the minimum defense spending target. Last year, 22 allies were expected to meet that benchmark, a sharp rise from just three nations a decade ago. At the summit in The Hague, members endorsed an overhaul of defense spending. They raised the target for “core defense spending” to 3.5% of GDP and broadened the criteria to include military support to Ukraine. To meet Trump’s 5% expectation, allies also committed 1.5% of GDP to other defense-related areas, such as upgrading infrastructure to support troop movements, enhancing cyber defenses, countering hybrid threats, and bolstering societal resilience to future conflicts. Progress will be assessed in 2029, after the next U.S. presidential election. Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre described the agreement as a milestone. “This declaration is historic. We are 32 allies supporting that ambition, which is huge,” he said. “We have been struggling to get above 2% and now we said 3.5%, which is necessary in order to reach our capabilities.” Earlier this month, NATO set procurement targets for allies to stockpile weapons and military supplies to better defend Europe, the Arctic, and the North Atlantic — a reflection of Washington’s pressure to boost defense readiness. Seven Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza as Iran-Israel Ceasefire holds steady Uncertainty Over U.S. Troop Presence in Europe If the Trump administration proceeds with plans to reduce the roughly 84,000 U.S. troops stationed in Europe, additional funding will be needed for European allies to cover security gaps. The Pentagon is expected to clarify its position in the coming months. Beyond Trump's demands, European allies and Canada have already increased defense spending amid rising fears of Russian aggression. Some NATO countries believe Russia could launch an attack on alliance territory before the decade ends — Hungary, however, disagrees. “I think Russia is not strong enough to represent a real threat to us. We are far stronger,” said Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, who is regarded as Russian President Vladimir Putin’s closest ally in Europe, while speaking to reporters with his hands in his pockets.

US President Donald Trump has been formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for his role in securing the ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The nomination came from Republican Congressman Buddy Carter of Georgia, who submitted a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee praising Trump’s “extraordinary and historic role” in ending the armed conflict and preventing Iran—described as the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism—from acquiring nuclear weapons. “President Trump’s influence was key to forging a swift agreement that many thought impossible,” said Carter, who has represented Georgia’s 1st District since 2015. He said Trump’s actions reflect the Nobel Prize’s core principles: promoting peace, preventing war, and fostering global harmony. Carter also acknowledged the complexity of the Middle East, saying Trump displayed both courage and clarity in achieving the breakthrough. Israel holds back on further Iran strikes after Trump call Trump  announced the Israel-Iran ceasefire on Monday night, suggesting the conflict be named the “12 Day War.” This announcement came just two days after Trump ordered unprecedented US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities to support Israeli military actions. Under Nobel rules, national lawmakers, university professors, and other qualified individuals can nominate candidates for the prestigious prize. However, Trump himself expressed doubt over winning, citing previous peace efforts that went unrecognized. “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,” Trump posted on Truth Social last Friday, following his administration’s role in brokering peace between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo. He added, “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won’t get one for stopping the war between India and Pakistan, I won’t get one for stopping the war between Serbia and Kosovo.” #With inputs from New York Post