United News of Bangladesh

US President Donald Trump has welcomed a newly announced agreement with Iran as a major diplomatic breakthrough, though uncertainty remains over key details that could determine whether the deal succeeds. Trump described the agreement as a “great deal” that would bring peace and stability to the Middle East. In a social media post on Sunday, he said the strategically important Strait of Hormuz would remain open to commercial shipping and that the United States would end its naval blockade. “Let the oil flow!” Trump wrote, expressing confidence that the agreement would help ease tensions in the region. However, many important questions remain unresolved, particularly regarding Iran’s nuclear programme and how the agreement will be implemented. US Vice President JD Vance said the deal includes provisions aimed at ensuring Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon and that Washington will be able to verify compliance. Despite those assurances, uncertainty remains over restrictions on uranium enrichment and the future of Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Further discussions are expected during a 60-day extension of the current ceasefire, when technical negotiations will continue to address unresolved issues. Iran has also signalled caution. The country's Supreme National Security Council said final negotiations would not proceed until the other side fulfils its commitments under the memorandum of understanding. Analysts say how both sides interpret and implement those commitments will play a critical role in determining whether the agreement holds. The deal could also have significant implications for global energy markets. Experts warn that oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz are unlikely to return immediately to normal levels, as shipping backlogs, mine-clearing operations and production adjustments may take several weeks. Another key factor is Israel’s role in the region. According to reports, Trump expressed frustration with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over military strikes in Lebanon that he believed could have jeopardised the nearly completed agreement. Although the deal survived that tension and was publicly announced, observers say renewed military action could threaten its stability. Any disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz could once again affect global energy supplies and international markets. The agreement may also have political implications inside the United States. Vance acknowledged that the conflict had contributed to higher energy prices, increasing financial pressure on many Americans. He expressed hope that energy costs would begin to decline following the agreement. Whether lower oil prices translate into broader economic relief could influence public opinion ahead of the upcoming congressional midterm elections. Recent polling suggests that many Americans remain dissatisfied with the state of the economy. Concerns over inflation, energy costs and household expenses continue to put pressure on the administration and the ruling Republican Party. Even so, the agreement is being viewed as a potentially important step toward reducing regional tensions and easing economic uncertainty, although its long-term success will depend on the outcome of upcoming negotiations and developments in the wider Middle East. With inputs from BBC